Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/27596
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWandrag, Elizabeth Men
dc.contributor.authorSheppard, Andyen
dc.contributor.authorDuncan, Richard Pen
dc.contributor.authorHulme, Philip Een
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-02T01:38:13Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-02T01:38:13Z-
dc.date.issued2013-09-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Ecology, 101(5), p. 1103-1113en
dc.identifier.issn1365-2745en
dc.identifier.issn0022-0477en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/27596-
dc.description.abstract1. The ability to form effective mutualisms with nitrogen-fixing bacteria (rhizobia) is implicated in the success of introduced leguminous plant species, such as Acacia. While Acacia appear to associate with rhizobia where introduced, there is evidence that the extent of this may limit success during early stages of colonization. 2. We examine three Australian Acacia species that have been introduced to New Zealand and ask whether variation in their ability to form rhizobial associations can explain differences in the degree to which they have established and spread since introduction. 3. In both Australia and New Zealand, we used glasshouse experiments to measure growth and nodulation of Acacia seedlings grown under two soil treatments: soils taken from underneath conspecifics (Host+ soils) and soils taken from the same sites but away from Acacia trees (Host ). We predicted that suitable rhizobia would be widespread in Australia leading to similar growth and nodulation in Host+ and Host soils. However, we predicted lower growth and nodulation in New Zealand Host soils, relative to New Zealand Host+ soils, due to limited availability of suitable rhizobia away from established conspecifics. We also predicted that differences between Host+ and Host soils would be less marked in Acacia that were more widespread in New Zealand. Finally, we examined whether the establishment of one Acacia species might facilitate the establishment of other species by planting seedlings into soils associated with each of the two congeners. 4. As predicted, seedling growth and nodulation were lower in Host than Host+ soils in New Zealand but there was no significant difference in Australia. In both countries, the difference between Host+ and Host soils was similar for all three species and in conspecific and congeneric soils. 5. Synthesis. In New Zealand, Acacia seedlings that colonize sites away from established conspecifics or congeners are likely to suffer reduced growth and nodulation, which may limit their ability to establish and spread away from introduction sites. However, this limitation was the same for all three species, implying that interactions with soil biota cannot explain differences in the degree to which these Acacia have spread in New Zealand.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltden
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Ecologyen
dc.titleReduced availability of rhizobia limits the performance but not invasiveness of introduced Acaciaen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1365-2745.12126en
dcterms.accessRightsBronzeen
local.contributor.firstnameElizabeth Men
local.contributor.firstnameAndyen
local.contributor.firstnameRichard Pen
local.contributor.firstnamePhilip Een
local.subject.for2008050103 Invasive Species Ecologyen
local.subject.for2008060504 Microbial Ecologyen
local.subject.seo2008960805 Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity at Regional or Larger Scalesen
local.subject.seo2008961499 Soils not elsewhere classifieden
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailewandrag@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen
local.format.startpage1103en
local.format.endpage1113en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume101en
local.identifier.issue5en
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameWandragen
local.contributor.lastnameShepparden
local.contributor.lastnameDuncanen
local.contributor.lastnameHulmeen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:ewandragen
local.profile.orcid0000-0001-8140-539Xen
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/27596en
local.date.onlineversion2013-06-13-
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleReduced availability of rhizobia limits the performance but not invasiveness of introduced Acaciaen
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteNew Zealand Tertiary Education Commission PhD scholarship; the Bio-Protection Research Centre; the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO)en
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorWandrag, Elizabeth Men
local.search.authorSheppard, Andyen
local.search.authorDuncan, Richard Pen
local.search.authorHulme, Philip Een
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.available2013en
local.year.published2013en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/10ebfa68-d24b-4ee6-a195-21f36b70f061en
local.subject.for2020410202 Biosecurity science and invasive species ecologyen
local.subject.for2020310703 Microbial ecologyen
local.subject.seo2020180203 Coastal or estuarine biodiversityen
local.subject.seo2020180699 Terrestrial systems and management not elsewhere classifieden
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

37
checked on Aug 3, 2024

Page view(s)

1,020
checked on Jul 28, 2024

Download(s)

4
checked on Jul 28, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.