Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/27047
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFan, Jinghuien
dc.contributor.authorGerber, Priscilla Fen
dc.contributor.authorCubas Atienzar, Anaen
dc.contributor.authorEppink, Lysanen
dc.contributor.authorWang, Chongen
dc.contributor.authorOpriessnig, Tanjaen
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-31T06:12:33Z-
dc.date.available2019-05-31T06:12:33Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationVeterinary Record, 185(1), p. 1-6en
dc.identifier.issn2042-7670en
dc.identifier.issn0042-4900en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/27047-
dc.description.abstractIn the UK, approximately 40 per cent of the pig breeding herds are outdoors. To monitor their porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) status, blood is collected commonly from piglets around weaning. Sample collection in British outdoor pigs often occurs during the early morning hours when the piglets tend to accumulate inside sheltered areas. For practical reasons, dry cotton swabs are occasionally used for blood collection and stored at room temperature until arrival in the laboratory. Detection of PRRSV RNA is a function of viral concentration, sample type and storage condition. To evaluate a possible impact of the sampling protocol on PRRSV1 detection, experimentally spiked blood samples using three dilutions of a representative PRRSV1 strain were prepared. In addition, blood samples from pigs naturally infected with PRRSV were obtained from a PRRSV-positive British herd. Spiked blood and blood from infected pigs were used to obtain sera, dry or wet (immersed in saline) polyester or cotton swabs and FTA cards. The different samples were stored for 24 hours, 48 hours or 7 days at 4°C or 20°C and tested by a real-time reverse transcriptase PRRSV PCR assay. Under the study conditions, the best matrix was serum (96.7 per cent), followed by wet swabs (78 per cent), dry swabs (61.3 per cent) and FTA cards (51 per cent). Polyester swabs (76 per cent) showed a better performance than cotton swabs (63.3 per cent). The reduction in sensitivity obtained for swabs and FTA cards was particularly high at low viral concentrations. The results indicate that wet polyester swabs should be used whenever possible.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherBMJ Groupen
dc.relation.ispartofVeterinary Recorden
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.titlePorcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus RNA detection in different matrices under typical storage conditions in the UKen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/vr.105312en
dc.identifier.pmid31040221en
dcterms.accessRightsUNE Greenen
local.contributor.firstnameJinghuien
local.contributor.firstnamePriscilla Fen
local.contributor.firstnameAnaen
local.contributor.firstnameLysanen
local.contributor.firstnameChongen
local.contributor.firstnameTanjaen
local.subject.for2008070712 Veterinary Virologyen
local.subject.seo2008830308 Pigsen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailpgerber2@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.grant.numberBB/J004324/1en
local.grant.numberBBS/E/D/20241864en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen
local.format.startpage1en
local.format.endpage6en
local.identifier.scopusid85065238426en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume185en
local.identifier.issue1en
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameFanen
local.contributor.lastnameGerberen
local.contributor.lastnameCubas Atienzaren
local.contributor.lastnameEppinken
local.contributor.lastnameWangen
local.contributor.lastnameOpriessnigen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:pgerber2en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-8343-8299en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/27047en
local.date.onlineversion2019-04-30-
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitlePorcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus RNA detection in different matrices under typical storage conditions in the UKen
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) Institute Strategic Programme Granten
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorFan, Jinghuien
local.search.authorGerber, Priscilla Fen
local.search.authorCubas Atienzar, Anaen
local.search.authorEppink, Lysanen
local.search.authorWang, Chongen
local.search.authorOpriessnig, Tanjaen
local.istranslatedNoen
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.identifier.wosid000474628600017en
local.year.available2019en
local.year.published2019en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/317db024-bab5-4886-b145-0d056a858ccaen
local.subject.for2020300914 Veterinary virologyen
local.subject.seo2020100410 Pigsen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
5 files
File Description SizeFormat 
open/PorcineFreitasGerber2020JournalArticlePostPeerReview.pdfOpen access version407.19 kBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show simple item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons