Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/26872
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGarnham, James Ien
dc.contributor.authorStockwell, Michelle Pen
dc.contributor.authorPollard, Carla Jen
dc.contributor.authorPickett, Evan Jen
dc.contributor.authorBower, Deborah Sen
dc.contributor.authorClulow, Johnen
dc.contributor.authorMahony, Michael Jen
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-15T04:08:59Z-
dc.date.available2019-05-15T04:08:59Z-
dc.date.issued2015-11-
dc.identifier.citationAustral Ecology, 40(7), p. 816-826en
dc.identifier.issn1442-9993en
dc.identifier.issn1442-9985en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/26872-
dc.description.abstractMitigating the threat of habitat loss requires actions such as restoring and creating new habitat. In order to effectively achieve this, species habitat requirements and use patterns need to be understood. While many studies have been conducted on the habitat choice of species, these generally focused on habitat use during periods of high activity and detection probability without considering seasonal shifts in habitat use. Understanding habitat selection by frogs during the winter season of low activity may be crucial since it may differ from that used during the summer and may be overlooked as important for population success. We describe the microhabitat use of the threatened green and golden bell frog (Litoria aurea) using radio tracking methods during winter when detection is low and knowledge is limited. We followed 26 individuals between May and July, 2011 to determine whether they selected specific overwintering microhabitats and related this to levels of individual exposure to predators, distance from the edge of the water and temperature of microhabitats. We found that overwintering bell frogs inhabited reeds and rock gabions more frequently than expected and that females used a reduced subset of microhabitats compared to males. Additionally, microhabitats used were more likely to conceal an individual from view, and the majority of overwintering sites were located within 5 m of the edge of the water which may be important for reducing the risk of predation and desiccation. Rock gabions had significantly warmer (1.2°C-1.8°C) mean temperatures than the other microhabitats used. The information presented here can be used in habitat creation and reintroduction programmes to provide habitat which is suitable during both the breeding and non-breeding season for the conservation of other populations.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Asiaen
dc.relation.ispartofAustral Ecologyen
dc.titleWinter microhabitat selection of a threatened pond amphibian in constructed urban wetlandsen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/aec.12256en
local.contributor.firstnameJames Ien
local.contributor.firstnameMichelle Pen
local.contributor.firstnameCarla Jen
local.contributor.firstnameEvan Jen
local.contributor.firstnameDeborah Sen
local.contributor.firstnameJohnen
local.contributor.firstnameMichael Jen
local.relation.isfundedbyARCen
local.subject.for2008050202 Conservation and Biodiversityen
local.subject.seo2008960807 Fresh, Ground and Surface Water Flora, Fauna and Biodiversityen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emaildbower3@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.grant.numberLP0989459en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeAustraliaen
local.format.startpage816en
local.format.endpage826en
local.identifier.scopusid84944168496en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume40en
local.identifier.issue7en
local.contributor.lastnameGarnhamen
local.contributor.lastnameStockwellen
local.contributor.lastnamePollarden
local.contributor.lastnamePicketten
local.contributor.lastnameBoweren
local.contributor.lastnameClulowen
local.contributor.lastnameMahonyen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:dbower3en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/26872en
local.date.onlineversion2015-04-14-
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleWinter microhabitat selection of a threatened pond amphibian in constructed urban wetlandsen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.relation.grantdescriptionARC/LP0989459en
local.search.authorGarnham, James Ien
local.search.authorStockwell, Michelle Pen
local.search.authorPollard, Carla Jen
local.search.authorPickett, Evan Jen
local.search.authorBower, Deborah Sen
local.search.authorClulow, Johnen
local.search.authorMahony, Michael Jen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.available2015en
local.year.published2015en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/78361a1e-0805-4917-b550-6f765ecfd4f2en
local.subject.for2020410401 Conservation and biodiversityen
local.subject.seo2020180303 Fresh, ground and surface water biodiversityen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

13
checked on Jul 6, 2024

Page view(s)

1,334
checked on Jun 23, 2024

Download(s)

8
checked on Jun 23, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.