Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/26822
Title: Effects of emerging infectious diseases on host population genetics: a review
Contributor(s): McKnight, Donald T (author); Schwarzkopf, Lin (author); Alford, Ross A (author); Bower, Deborah S  (author)orcid ; Zenger, Kyall R (author)
Publication Date: 2017-12
Early Online Version: 2017-04-18
DOI: 10.1007/s10592-017-0974-2
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/26822
Abstract: Emerging infectious diseases threaten the survival of many species and populations by causing large declines and altering life history traits and population demographics. Therefore, it is imperative to understand how diseases impact wildlife populations so that effective management strategies can be planned. Many studies have focused on understanding the ecology of host/pathogen interactions, but it is equally important to understand the effects on host population genetic structure. In this review, we examined the literature on how infectious diseases influence host population genetic makeup, with a particular focus on whether or not they alter gene flow patterns, reduce genetic variability, and drive selection. Although the results were mixed, there was evidence for all of these outcomes. Diseases often fragmented populations into small, genetically distinct units with limited gene flow among them. In some cases, these isolated populations showed the genetic hallmarks of bottlenecks and inbreeding, but in other populations, there was sufficient gene flow or enough survivors to prevent genetic drift and inbreeding. Direct evidence of diseases acting as selective pressures in wild populations is somewhat limited, but there are several clear examples of it occurring. Also, several studies found that gene flow can impact the evolution of small populations either beneficially, by providing them with variation, or detrimentally, by swamping them with alleles that are not locally adaptive. Thus, differences in gene flow levels may explain why some species adapt while others do not. There are also intermediate cases, whereby some species may adapt to disease, but not at a rate that is meaningful for conservation purposes.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Conservation Genetics, 18(6), p. 1235-1245
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Place of Publication: Netherlands
ISSN: 1572-9737
1566-0621
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 060411 Population, Ecological and Evolutionary Genetics
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 410402 Environmental assessment and monitoring
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 960807 Fresh, Ground and Surface Water Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 180303 Fresh, ground and surface water biodiversity
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science

Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

36
checked on Mar 16, 2024

Page view(s)

1,282
checked on Feb 4, 2024

Download(s)

2
checked on Feb 4, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.