Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/26822
Title: | Effects of emerging infectious diseases on host population genetics: a review | Contributor(s): | McKnight, Donald T (author); Schwarzkopf, Lin (author); Alford, Ross A (author); Bower, Deborah S (author) ; Zenger, Kyall R (author) | Publication Date: | 2017-12 | Early Online Version: | 2017-04-18 | DOI: | 10.1007/s10592-017-0974-2 | Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/26822 | Abstract: | Emerging infectious diseases threaten the survival of many species and populations by causing large declines and altering life history traits and population demographics. Therefore, it is imperative to understand how diseases impact wildlife populations so that effective management strategies can be planned. Many studies have focused on understanding the ecology of host/pathogen interactions, but it is equally important to understand the effects on host population genetic structure. In this review, we examined the literature on how infectious diseases influence host population genetic makeup, with a particular focus on whether or not they alter gene flow patterns, reduce genetic variability, and drive selection. Although the results were mixed, there was evidence for all of these outcomes. Diseases often fragmented populations into small, genetically distinct units with limited gene flow among them. In some cases, these isolated populations showed the genetic hallmarks of bottlenecks and inbreeding, but in other populations, there was sufficient gene flow or enough survivors to prevent genetic drift and inbreeding. Direct evidence of diseases acting as selective pressures in wild populations is somewhat limited, but there are several clear examples of it occurring. Also, several studies found that gene flow can impact the evolution of small populations either beneficially, by providing them with variation, or detrimentally, by swamping them with alleles that are not locally adaptive. Thus, differences in gene flow levels may explain why some species adapt while others do not. There are also intermediate cases, whereby some species may adapt to disease, but not at a rate that is meaningful for conservation purposes. | Publication Type: | Journal Article | Source of Publication: | Conservation Genetics, 18(6), p. 1235-1245 | Publisher: | Springer Netherlands | Place of Publication: | Netherlands | ISSN: | 1572-9737 1566-0621 |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: | 060411 Population, Ecological and Evolutionary Genetics | Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: | 410402 Environmental assessment and monitoring | Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: | 960807 Fresh, Ground and Surface Water Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity | Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: | 180303 Fresh, ground and surface water biodiversity | Peer Reviewed: | Yes | HERDC Category Description: | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal |
---|---|
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article School of Environmental and Rural Science |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format |
---|
SCOPUSTM
Citations
37
checked on Jul 6, 2024
Page view(s)
1,400
checked on Jul 7, 2024
Download(s)
2
checked on Jul 7, 2024
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.