Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/26754
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMoss, Amy Fen
dc.contributor.authorChrystal, Peter Ven
dc.contributor.authorTruong, Ha Hen
dc.contributor.authorSelle, Peter Hen
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Sonia Yunen
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-18T04:42:55Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-18T04:42:55Z-
dc.date.issued2017-09-12-
dc.identifier.citationBritish Poultry Science, 58(6), p. 718-728en
dc.identifier.issn1466-1799en
dc.identifier.issn0007-1668en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/26754-
dc.description.abstract1. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of pre- and post-pellet whole grain wheat additions to diets on growth performance, gizzard and pancreas development, nutrient utilisation and starch and protein (N) digestibility coefficients in broiler chickens via an equilateral triangle response surface design. 2. The three apical treatments of the equilateral triangle comprised (1A) a standard diet containing 600 g/kg ground wheat, (2B) the same diet containing 600 g/kg pre-pellet whole wheat and (3C) the same diet containing 300 g/kg ground wheat and 300 g/kg post-pellet whole wheat. Seven blends of the three apical diets were located within the triangle to complete the design and a total of 360 male Ross 308 chicks were offered the ten experimental diets from 7 to 28 d post-hatch. Model prediction and response surface plots were generated with R 3.0.3 software. 3. The most efficient FCR of 1.466 was observed in birds offered an almost equal mixture of the pre- and post-pellet whole grain apical dietary treatments, which corresponded to 172 g/kg ground grain, 256 g/kg pre-pellet whole grain, 172 g/kg post-pellet whole grain in a diet containing 600 g/kg wheat. 4. The most efficient energy utilisation (ME:GE ratio of 0.766) was observed in birds offered a blend of the ground grain and pre-pellet whole grain apical dietary treatments which corresponded to a mixture of 384 g/kg pre-pellet whole grain and 216 g/kg ground grain. 5. Pre-pellet whole grain feeding generated the most pronounced responses in increased relative gizzard contents, reduced gizzard pH and increased relative pancreas weights. Consideration is given to the likely differences between pre- and post-pellet whole grain feeding.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Poultry Scienceen
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleEvaluation of ground grain versus pre- and post-pellet whole grain additions to poultry diets via a response surface designen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00071668.2017.1370698en
dc.identifier.pmid28841035en
dcterms.accessRightsUNE Greenen
local.contributor.firstnameAmy Fen
local.contributor.firstnamePeter Ven
local.contributor.firstnameHa Hen
local.contributor.firstnamePeter Hen
local.contributor.firstnameSonia Yunen
local.subject.for2008070204 Animal Nutritionen
local.subject.for2008070202 Animal Growth and Developmenten
local.subject.seo2008830309 Poultryen
local.profile.schoolEnvironmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailamoss22@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.grant.numberPRJ-009099en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen
local.format.startpage718en
local.format.endpage728en
local.identifier.scopusid85029456948en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume58en
local.identifier.issue6en
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameMossen
local.contributor.lastnameChrystalen
local.contributor.lastnameTruongen
local.contributor.lastnameSelleen
local.contributor.lastnameLiuen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:amoss22en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-8647-8448en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/26754en
local.date.onlineversion2017-08-25-
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleEvaluation of ground grain versus pre- and post-pellet whole grain additions to poultry diets via a response surface designen
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteRIRDC Chicken-meat Committeeen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorMoss, Amy Fen
local.search.authorChrystal, Peter Ven
local.search.authorTruong, Ha Hen
local.search.authorSelle, Peter Hen
local.search.authorLiu, Sonia Yunen
local.open.fileurlhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/f5f7289b-d8fb-4b7e-94e8-0b8117808a9den
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.identifier.wosid000415711100016en
local.year.available2017en
local.year.published2017en
local.fileurl.openhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/f5f7289b-d8fb-4b7e-94e8-0b8117808a9den
local.fileurl.openpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/f5f7289b-d8fb-4b7e-94e8-0b8117808a9den
local.subject.for2020300303 Animal nutritionen
local.subject.for2020300301 Animal growth and developmenten
local.subject.seo2020100411 Poultryen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/EvaluationMoss2017JournalArticle.pdfPublished version1.85 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

8
checked on Apr 6, 2024

Page view(s)

926
checked on Mar 8, 2023

Download(s)

52
checked on Mar 8, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons