Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/26754
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Moss, Amy F | en |
dc.contributor.author | Chrystal, Peter V | en |
dc.contributor.author | Truong, Ha H | en |
dc.contributor.author | Selle, Peter H | en |
dc.contributor.author | Liu, Sonia Yun | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-04-18T04:42:55Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-04-18T04:42:55Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017-09-12 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | British Poultry Science, 58(6), p. 718-728 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1466-1799 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0007-1668 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/26754 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 1. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of pre- and post-pellet whole grain wheat additions to diets on growth performance, gizzard and pancreas development, nutrient utilisation and starch and protein (N) digestibility coefficients in broiler chickens via an equilateral triangle response surface design. 2. The three apical treatments of the equilateral triangle comprised (1A) a standard diet containing 600 g/kg ground wheat, (2B) the same diet containing 600 g/kg pre-pellet whole wheat and (3C) the same diet containing 300 g/kg ground wheat and 300 g/kg post-pellet whole wheat. Seven blends of the three apical diets were located within the triangle to complete the design and a total of 360 male Ross 308 chicks were offered the ten experimental diets from 7 to 28 d post-hatch. Model prediction and response surface plots were generated with R 3.0.3 software. 3. The most efficient FCR of 1.466 was observed in birds offered an almost equal mixture of the pre- and post-pellet whole grain apical dietary treatments, which corresponded to 172 g/kg ground grain, 256 g/kg pre-pellet whole grain, 172 g/kg post-pellet whole grain in a diet containing 600 g/kg wheat. 4. The most efficient energy utilisation (ME:GE ratio of 0.766) was observed in birds offered a blend of the ground grain and pre-pellet whole grain apical dietary treatments which corresponded to a mixture of 384 g/kg pre-pellet whole grain and 216 g/kg ground grain. 5. Pre-pellet whole grain feeding generated the most pronounced responses in increased relative gizzard contents, reduced gizzard pH and increased relative pancreas weights. Consideration is given to the likely differences between pre- and post-pellet whole grain feeding. | en |
dc.language | en | en |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | en |
dc.relation.ispartof | British Poultry Science | en |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.title | Evaluation of ground grain versus pre- and post-pellet whole grain additions to poultry diets via a response surface design | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/00071668.2017.1370698 | en |
dc.identifier.pmid | 28841035 | en |
dcterms.accessRights | UNE Green | en |
local.contributor.firstname | Amy F | en |
local.contributor.firstname | Peter V | en |
local.contributor.firstname | Ha H | en |
local.contributor.firstname | Peter H | en |
local.contributor.firstname | Sonia Yun | en |
local.subject.for2008 | 070204 Animal Nutrition | en |
local.subject.for2008 | 070202 Animal Growth and Development | en |
local.subject.seo2008 | 830309 Poultry | en |
local.profile.school | Environmental and Rural Science | en |
local.profile.email | amoss22@une.edu.au | en |
local.output.category | C1 | en |
local.grant.number | PRJ-009099 | en |
local.record.place | au | en |
local.record.institution | University of New England | en |
local.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en |
local.format.startpage | 718 | en |
local.format.endpage | 728 | en |
local.identifier.scopusid | 85029456948 | en |
local.peerreviewed | Yes | en |
local.identifier.volume | 58 | en |
local.identifier.issue | 6 | en |
local.access.fulltext | Yes | en |
local.contributor.lastname | Moss | en |
local.contributor.lastname | Chrystal | en |
local.contributor.lastname | Truong | en |
local.contributor.lastname | Selle | en |
local.contributor.lastname | Liu | en |
dc.identifier.staff | une-id:amoss22 | en |
local.profile.orcid | 0000-0002-8647-8448 | en |
local.profile.role | author | en |
local.profile.role | author | en |
local.profile.role | author | en |
local.profile.role | author | en |
local.profile.role | author | en |
local.identifier.unepublicationid | une:1959.11/26754 | en |
local.date.onlineversion | 2017-08-25 | - |
dc.identifier.academiclevel | Academic | en |
dc.identifier.academiclevel | Academic | en |
dc.identifier.academiclevel | Academic | en |
dc.identifier.academiclevel | Academic | en |
dc.identifier.academiclevel | Academic | en |
local.title.maintitle | Evaluation of ground grain versus pre- and post-pellet whole grain additions to poultry diets via a response surface design | en |
local.relation.fundingsourcenote | RIRDC Chicken-meat Committee | en |
local.output.categorydescription | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal | en |
local.search.author | Moss, Amy F | en |
local.search.author | Chrystal, Peter V | en |
local.search.author | Truong, Ha H | en |
local.search.author | Selle, Peter H | en |
local.search.author | Liu, Sonia Yun | en |
local.open.fileurl | https://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/f5f7289b-d8fb-4b7e-94e8-0b8117808a9d | en |
local.uneassociation | Unknown | en |
local.identifier.wosid | 000415711100016 | en |
local.year.available | 2017 | en |
local.year.published | 2017 | en |
local.fileurl.open | https://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/f5f7289b-d8fb-4b7e-94e8-0b8117808a9d | en |
local.fileurl.openpublished | https://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/f5f7289b-d8fb-4b7e-94e8-0b8117808a9d | en |
local.subject.for2020 | 300303 Animal nutrition | en |
local.subject.for2020 | 300301 Animal growth and development | en |
local.subject.seo2020 | 100411 Poultry | en |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article School of Environmental and Rural Science |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
openpublished/EvaluationMoss2017JournalArticle.pdf | Published version | 1.85 MB | Adobe PDF Download Adobe | View/Open |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
8
checked on Jan 25, 2025
Page view(s)
1,162
checked on Jun 16, 2024
Download(s)
86
checked on Jun 16, 2024
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License