Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/23441
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSmart, Neilen
dc.contributor.authorDieberg, Gudrunen
dc.contributor.authorKing, Nicolaen
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T12:12:00Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 72(3), p. 347-347en
dc.identifier.issn1558-3597en
dc.identifier.issn0735-1097en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/23441-
dc.description.abstractWe thank the editor of the Journal for the opportunity to respond to the letters by Dr. Shah, Dr. Ma and colleagues, and Dr. Zhao and colleagues, which all make similar statements about 3 aspects of the methodology used in our recent meta-analysis. As the points raised are sufficiently similar, we will address them as if they were derived from the same letter. First, the use of odds ratios instead of hazard ratios was raised in the letters to the editor.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherElsevier Incen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the American College of Cardiologyen
dc.titleReply: On the Use of Odds Ratios Versus Hazard Ratios, Meta-Regression, and Heterogeneity in Meta-Analysesen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jacc.2018.05.018en
dc.subject.keywordsMedical and Health Sciencesen
local.contributor.firstnameNeilen
local.contributor.firstnameGudrunen
local.contributor.firstnameNicolaen
local.subject.for2008119999 Medical and Health Sciences not elsewhere classifieden
local.subject.seo2008920118 Surgical Methods and Proceduresen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Science and Technologyen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Science and Technologyen
local.profile.emailnsmart2@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailgdieberg@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailNicola.king@plymouth.ac.uken
local.output.categoryC4en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20180703-120218en
local.publisher.placeUnited States of Americaen
local.format.startpage347en
local.format.endpage347en
local.identifier.scopusid85049332576en
local.identifier.volume72en
local.identifier.issue3en
local.title.subtitleOn the Use of Odds Ratios Versus Hazard Ratios, Meta-Regression, and Heterogeneity in Meta-Analysesen
local.contributor.lastnameSmarten
local.contributor.lastnameDiebergen
local.contributor.lastnameKingen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:nsmart2en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:gdiebergen
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-8290-6409en
local.profile.orcid0000-0001-7191-182Xen
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:23624en
local.identifier.handlehttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/23441en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleReplyen
local.output.categorydescriptionC4 Letter of Noteen
local.search.authorSmart, Neilen
local.search.authorDieberg, Gudrunen
local.search.authorKing, Nicolaen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2018en
local.subject.for2020320101 Cardiology (incl. cardiovascular diseases)en
local.subject.for2020490508 Statistical data scienceen
local.subject.seo2020200101 Diagnosis of human diseases and conditionsen
dc.notification.token3c78a6c8-6076-42f0-951c-87f728bae5e6en
local.codeupdate.date2021-11-19T16:32:02.224en
local.codeupdate.epersonnsmart2@une.edu.auen
local.codeupdate.finalisedtrueen
local.original.for2020undefineden
local.original.seo2020undefineden
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Science and Technology
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.