Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/23353
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, Helenen
dc.contributor.authorReid, Nicken
dc.contributor.authorHunter, John Ten
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-25T14:30:00Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationThe Rangeland Journal, 40(1), p. 9-18en
dc.identifier.issn1834-7541en
dc.identifier.issn1036-9872en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/23353-
dc.description.abstractMethods for estimating aboveground herbaceous biomass in the field have generally involved calibrating visual estimates against clipped, dried and weighed biomass samples, requiring lengthy periods of estimation and destructive sampling in the field. Here we developed and tested a photographic estimation technique (PET) that minimises field time and provides accurate estimates of aboveground herbaceous biomass. Photographs of the biomass to be estimated taken in the field are ranked against calibration images of known biomass in the laboratory. The study was conducted in New South Wales, Australia, in grassy forest dells and grasslands at Booroolong Nature Reserve in the temperate New England Tablelands Bioregion and in semi-arid grassy shrubland on Naree Station in the arid Mulga Lands Bioregion. Photographs of quadrats containing the herbaceous biomass to be estimated were taken in successive years at both sites. Calibration and validation quadrats were also photographed, and the vegetation clipped, bagged, dried and weighed. The calibration and validation photographs were rank-ordered independently by three observers in terms of estimated dry weight, and the validation quadrats assigned a putative dry weight by reference to the known weights of the calibration images in the rank order. The accuracy of each observer's estimates was assessed by regressing the estimated weight of each validation quadrat against the actual weight, which was withheld from the observer during the estimation procedure. Regression analysis of visually estimated weights on actual weights of validation quadrats yielded regression coefficients (R2) of 0.80-0.98 and 0.81-0.97 in the temperate-zone and arid-zone sites, respectively. PET was reliably used to visually estimate aboveground herbaceous biomass across a range of communities in two different climatic zones. The benefits of PET include reduced field time, minimisation of destructive sampling and avoidance of observer drift in estimating biomass in the field.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherCSIRO Publishingen
dc.relation.ispartofThe Rangeland Journalen
dc.titleEstimation of aboveground herbaceous biomass using visually ranked digital photographsen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1071/rj17033en
dc.subject.keywordsBiological Sciencesen
dc.subject.keywordsCommunity Ecology (excl. Invasive Species Ecology)en
dc.subject.keywordsEcologyen
local.contributor.firstnameHelenen
local.contributor.firstnameNicken
local.contributor.firstnameJohn Ten
local.subject.for2008060299 Ecology not elsewhere classifieden
local.subject.for2008069999 Biological Sciences not elsewhere classifieden
local.subject.for2008060202 Community Ecology (excl. Invasive Species Ecology)en
local.subject.seo2008969999 Environment not elsewhere classifieden
local.subject.seo2008960699 Environmental and Natural Resource Evaluation not elsewhere classifieden
local.subject.seo2008960899 Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity of Environments not elsewhere classifieden
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailhmorgan3@myune.edu.auen
local.profile.emailnrei3@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailjhunte20@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-chute-20180524-152313en
local.publisher.placeAustraliaen
local.format.startpage9en
local.format.endpage18en
local.identifier.scopusid85044345842en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume40en
local.identifier.issue1en
local.contributor.lastnameMorganen
local.contributor.lastnameReiden
local.contributor.lastnameHunteren
dc.identifier.staffune-id:hmorgan3en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:nrei3en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:jhunte20en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-4377-9734en
local.profile.orcid0000-0001-5112-0465en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:23535en
local.identifier.handlehttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/23353en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleEstimation of aboveground herbaceous biomass using visually ranked digital photographsen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorMorgan, Helenen
local.search.authorReid, Nicken
local.search.authorHunter, John Ten
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2018en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/4c0b30f8-1127-4372-81e9-5c031a637f96en
local.subject.for2020310302 Community ecology (excl. invasive species ecology)en
local.subject.seo2020180304 Freshwater assimilative capacityen
local.subject.seo2020189999 Other environmental management not elsewhere classifieden
dc.notification.token7c7b16d4-27ae-43ff-80e0-6f7b012416c9en
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
checked on Oct 26, 2024

Page view(s)

2,518
checked on Mar 31, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.