Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Summary Execution: The Impact of Alternative Summarization Strategies on Local Governments
Contributor(s): Drew, Joseph  (author)orcid ; Dollery, Brian E  (author)
Publication Date: 2016
Handle Link:
Abstract: Performance management in the public sector, including local government, has become far more pervasive in recent decades. Often performance indicators are summarized into a single score to enhance understanding and ease dissemination. However, the summation of performance indicators caries a risk that the rating assigned may largely be an artefact of the summarization strategy rather than an accurate representation of municipal performance. We employ the recent evaluation of New South Wales' municipal performance to demonstrate that the performance indicator compilation strategy is indeed a major determinant of the ratings assigned to local councils. Moreover, we illustrate how ratings may exert a constitutive effect on municipalities by altering organizational behavior. A number of policy lessons are drawn from our empirical analysis, including significant methodological considerations and the need for higher levels of transparency.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Public Administration Quarterly, 40(4), p. 814-841
Publisher: Southern Public Administration Education Foundation Inc
Place of Publication: United States of America
ISSN: 2327-4433
Field of Research (FOR): 160509 Public Administration
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Other Links:
Statistics to Oct 2018: Visitors: 14
Views: 15
Downloads: 0
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
UNE Business School

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

Page view(s)

checked on Feb 8, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.