Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/19698
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStrucken, Evaen
dc.contributor.authorLee, SHen
dc.contributor.authorLee, HKen
dc.contributor.authorSong, KDen
dc.contributor.authorGibson, Johnen
dc.contributor.authorGondro, Cedricen
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-08T14:34:00Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 133(1), p. 13-23en
dc.identifier.issn1439-0388en
dc.identifier.issn0931-2668en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/19698-
dc.description.abstractSummary: Reliability of parentage test panels is usually based on its power to exclude wrong parentage assignments based on allele frequencies. We evaluated the rates of false exclusions and inclusions in parentage assignments, and how these results are affected by allele frequencies, panel sizes and the number of allowed mismatches. We also evaluated the reliability of parentage testing by comparing populations with distinct genetic backgrounds using pure and composite families of cattle and sheep. Allowing for 1% genotype mismatches in true parent-offspring relations provided the best compromise between false-positive and false-negative assignments. Pure breeds needed at least 200-210 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers to correctly assign relations, but between 700 and 890 markers to avoid assigning incorrect relationships. Composite breeds needed between 220 (sheep) and 500 (cattle) markers for correct assignment; 680 (cattle) to 4400 (sheep) SNPs were needed to eliminate false-positive assignments. Allowing 0% genotype mismatches decreased false-positive but increased false-negative assignments, whilst a higher threshold of 2% showed the opposite effects. Panels with high minor allele frequencies (0.35-0.45) provided the best chance for correct parentage resolutions requiring fewer markers. Further, we propose that a dynamic threshold would allow adapting to population specific error rates. A comparison to the performance of the official International Society for Animal Genetics SNP panel for cattle and a recently published SNP panel for sheep showed that randomly selected markers performed only slightly worse for the applied parentage test based on opposing homozygotes. This suggests that even with carefully selected panels, only marginal assignment improvements are obtainable for a particular number of SNPs. The main point for improvement is the number of markers used. We recommend using at least 200 SNP markers for parentage testing if the aim is to reduce false-negative results. To fully exclude false positives at least 700 markers are required.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Verlag GmbHen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Animal Breeding and Geneticsen
dc.titleHow many markers are enough? Factors influencing parentage testing in different livestock populationsen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jbg.12179en
dc.subject.keywordsAnimal Breedingen
local.contributor.firstnameEvaen
local.contributor.firstnameSHen
local.contributor.firstnameHKen
local.contributor.firstnameKDen
local.contributor.firstnameJohnen
local.contributor.firstnameCedricen
local.subject.for2008070201 Animal Breedingen
local.subject.seo2008830302 Dairy Cattleen
local.subject.seo2008830301 Beef Cattleen
local.subject.seo2008830310 Sheep - Meaten
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailestrucke@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailjgibson5@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailcgondro2@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-chute-20161112-151546en
local.publisher.placeGermanyen
local.format.startpage13en
local.format.endpage23en
local.identifier.scopusid84954393026en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume133en
local.identifier.issue1en
local.contributor.lastnameStruckenen
local.contributor.lastnameLeeen
local.contributor.lastnameLeeen
local.contributor.lastnameSongen
local.contributor.lastnameGibsonen
local.contributor.lastnameGondroen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:estruckeen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:jgibson5en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:cgondro2en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-2715-0733en
local.profile.orcid0000-0003-0371-2401en
local.profile.orcid0000-0003-0666-656Xen
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:19888en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleHow many markers are enough? Factors influencing parentage testing in different livestock populationsen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorStrucken, Evaen
local.search.authorLee, SHen
local.search.authorLee, HKen
local.search.authorSong, KDen
local.search.authorGibson, Johnen
local.search.authorGondro, Cedricen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.identifier.wosid000368145300003en
local.year.published2016en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/32e04f7e-c166-4e15-af7f-7ad8ef74de31en
local.subject.for2020300305 Animal reproduction and breedingen
local.subject.seo2020100402 Dairy cattleen
local.subject.seo2020100401 Beef cattleen
local.subject.seo2020100412 Sheep for meaten
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

43
checked on Nov 9, 2024

Page view(s)

1,482
checked on Apr 21, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.