Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/18322
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFellows, Chrisen
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-04T15:58:00Z
dc.date.issued2015en
dc.identifier.citationCreative Approaches to Research, 8(1), p. 57-74en
dc.identifier.issn1835-9442en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/18322en
dc.description.abstractCritical Discourse Analysis may be broadly understood as the analysis of linguistic structures to determine how they embody and reflect underlying power structures (Fairclough, 1989). More narrowly, it has been defined as having an explicit political aim: to frame discourse in such a fashion as to impose a dichotomy between a more powerful group and a less powerful group, and to empower the less powerful group (Wodak & Meyer, 2001). This narrower normative definition has a strong implied value judgment. As defined by van Dijk, Critical Discourse Analysis "is a type of discourse analytical research that primarily studies the way social power abuse, dominance, and inequality are enacted, reproduced, and resisted by text and talk in the social and political context. With such dissident research, critical discourse analysts take explicit position, and thus want to understand, expose, and ultimately resist social inequality"(van Dijk, 1993).en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherAssociation for Qualitative Researchen
dc.relation.ispartofCreative Approaches to Researchen
dc.titleCargo-Cult Science and the Mimesis of Research Practice: Response to "Critical Discourse Analysis of Rhetoric Against Complementary Medicine"en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dcterms.accessRightsGolden
dc.subject.keywordsApplied Ethicsen
dc.subject.keywordsHistory and Philosophy of Medicineen
dc.subject.keywordsComplementary and Alternative Medicineen
local.contributor.firstnameChrisen
local.subject.for2008220199 Applied Ethics not elsewhere classifieden
local.subject.for2008220205 History and Philosophy of Medicineen
local.subject.for2008110499 Complementary and Alternative Medicine not elsewhere classifieden
local.subject.seo2008970122 Expanding Knowledge in Philosophy and Religious Studiesen
local.subject.seo2008950499 Religion and Ethics not elsewhere classifieden
local.subject.seo2008920499 Public Health (excl. Specific Population Health) not elsewhere classified)en
local.profile.schoolSchool of Science and Technologyen
local.profile.emailcfellows@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC2en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20150320-16384en
local.publisher.placeAustraliaen
local.format.startpage57en
local.format.endpage74en
local.url.openhttp://iaqr.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/CAR8_1_Full1.pdfen
local.identifier.volume8en
local.identifier.issue1en
local.title.subtitleResponse to "Critical Discourse Analysis of Rhetoric Against Complementary Medicine"en
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameFellowsen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:cfellowsen
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-8976-8651en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:18526en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleCargo-Cult Science and the Mimesis of Research Practiceen
local.output.categorydescriptionC2 Non-Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.description.statisticsepubsVisitors: 141<br />Views: 150<br />Downloads: 0en
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Science and Technology
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

102
checked on Feb 6, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

 

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

 

Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.