Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/15876
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcGraw, Christinaen
dc.contributor.authorKhalil, Gamalen
dc.contributor.authorCallis, Jamesen
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-14T16:14:00Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 112(21), p. 8079-8084en
dc.identifier.issn1932-7455en
dc.identifier.issn1932-7447en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/15876-
dc.description.abstractDespite the widespread use of luminescence lifetimes in physical measurements, there seems to be no consensus on the best method for lifetime determination. Researchers in this field split into two camps: those who favor methods that proceed from time-domain data and those who favor methods that proceed from frequency-domain data. System theory provides unique insight into the strengths and limitations of these methods of lifetime determination. First, system theory shows that the impulse response experiment and the frequency sweep experiment can both uniquely specify a shift-invariant linear system. Further, the time and frequency data sets are related by the Fourier transform. A careful comparison of these two methods was carried out with both numerical simulations and experiments using the same sample, light source, and detector. These comparisons were not limited to impulse and sine wave excitation; chirp, square wave, and random excitation sequences were evaluated as well. The results indicate that for the same total excitation energies time-domain sequences with a substantial dark period have the lowest uncertainty in the lifetime parameter estimates.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherAmerican Chemical Societyen
dc.relation.ispartofThe Journal of Physical Chemistry Cen
dc.titleComparison of Time and Frequency Domain Methods for Luminescence Lifetime Measurementsen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1021/jp711867uen
dc.subject.keywordsAnalytical Chemistryen
dc.subject.keywordsInstrumental Methods (excl Immunological and Bioassay Methods)en
local.contributor.firstnameChristinaen
local.contributor.firstnameGamalen
local.contributor.firstnameJamesen
local.subject.for2008030199 Analytical Chemistry not elsewhere classifieden
local.subject.for2008030105 Instrumental Methods (excl Immunological and Bioassay Methods)en
local.subject.seo2008970103 Expanding Knowledge in the Chemical Sciencesen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Science and Technologyen
local.profile.emailcmcgraw@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20141012-22069en
local.publisher.placeUnited States of Americaen
local.format.startpage8079en
local.format.endpage8084en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume112en
local.identifier.issue21en
local.contributor.lastnameMcGrawen
local.contributor.lastnameKhalilen
local.contributor.lastnameCallisen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:cmcgrawen
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:16113en
local.identifier.handlehttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/15876en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleComparison of Time and Frequency Domain Methods for Luminescence Lifetime Measurementsen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorMcGraw, Christinaen
local.search.authorKhalil, Gamalen
local.search.authorCallis, Jamesen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2008en
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Science and Technology
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

17
checked on Jul 6, 2024

Page view(s)

1,244
checked on May 19, 2024

Download(s)

2
checked on May 19, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.