Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/15664
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGreen, Peter Ten
dc.contributor.authorO'Dowd, Dennis Jen
dc.contributor.authorAbbott, Kirstien
dc.contributor.authorJeffery, Micken
dc.contributor.authorRetallick, Kenten
dc.contributor.authorMacNally, Ralphen
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-18T11:24:00Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationEcology, 92(9), p. 1758-1768en
dc.identifier.issn1939-9170en
dc.identifier.issn0012-9658en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/15664-
dc.description.abstractIn multiply invaded ecosystems, introduced species should interact with each other as well as with native species. Invader-invader interactions may affect the success of further invaders by altering attributes of recipient communities and propagule pressure. The invasional meltdown hypothesis (IMH) posits that positive interactions among invaders initiate positive population-level feedback that intensifies impacts and promotes secondary invasions. IMH remains controversial: few studies show feedback between invaders that amplifies their effects, and none yet demonstrate facilitation of entry and spread of secondary invaders. Our results show that supercolonies of an alien ant, promoted by mutualism with introduced honeydew-secreting scale insects, permitted invasion by an exotic land snail on Christmas Island, Indian Ocean. Modeling of land snail spread over 750 sites across 135 km² over seven years showed that the probability of land snail invasion was facilitated 253-fold in ant supercolonies but impeded in intact forest where predaceous native land crabs remained abundant. Land snail occurrence at neighboring sites, a measure of propagule pressure, also promoted land snail spread. Site comparisons and experiments revealed that ant super colonies, by killing land crabs but not land snails, disrupted biotic resistance and provided enemy-free space. Predation pressure on land snails was lower (28.6%), survival 115 times longer, and abundance 20-fold greater in supercolonies than in intact forest. Whole-ecosystem suppression of supercolonies reversed the probability of land snail invasion by allowing recolonization of land crabs; land snails were much less likely (0.79%) to invade sites where supercolonies were suppressed than where they remained intact. Our results provide strong empirical evidence for IMH by demonstrating that mutualism between invaders reconfigures key interactions in the recipient community. This facilitates entry of secondary invaders and elevates propagule pressure, propagating their spread at the whole-ecosystem level. We show that identification and management of key facilitative interactions in invaded ecosystems can be used to reverse impacts and restore resistance to further invasions.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Incen
dc.relation.ispartofEcologyen
dc.titleInvasional meltdown: Invader-invader mutualism facilitates a secondary invasionen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1890/11-0050.1en
dc.subject.keywordsInvasive Species Ecologyen
dc.subject.keywordsInvertebrate Biologyen
dc.subject.keywordsCommunity Ecology (excl Invasive Species Ecology)en
local.contributor.firstnamePeter Ten
local.contributor.firstnameDennis Jen
local.contributor.firstnameKirstien
local.contributor.firstnameMicken
local.contributor.firstnameKenten
local.contributor.firstnameRalphen
local.subject.for2008060202 Community Ecology (excl Invasive Species Ecology)en
local.subject.for2008050103 Invasive Species Ecologyen
local.subject.for2008060808 Invertebrate Biologyen
local.subject.seo2008960402 Control of Animal Pests, Diseases and Exotic Species in Coastal and Estuarine Environmentsen
local.subject.seo2008970106 Expanding Knowledge in the Biological Sciencesen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Science and Technologyen
local.profile.emailkabbott6@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20140904-09471en
local.publisher.placeUnited States of Americaen
local.format.startpage1758en
local.format.endpage1768en
local.identifier.scopusid80051863550en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume92en
local.identifier.issue9en
local.title.subtitleInvader-invader mutualism facilitates a secondary invasionen
local.contributor.lastnameGreenen
local.contributor.lastnameO'Dowden
local.contributor.lastnameAbbotten
local.contributor.lastnameJefferyen
local.contributor.lastnameRetallicken
local.contributor.lastnameMacNallyen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:kabbott6en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:15901en
local.identifier.handlehttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/15664en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleInvasional meltdownen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorGreen, Peter Ten
local.search.authorO'Dowd, Dennis Jen
local.search.authorAbbott, Kirstien
local.search.authorJeffery, Micken
local.search.authorRetallick, Kenten
local.search.authorMacNally, Ralphen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2011en
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

151
checked on Apr 27, 2024

Page view(s)

1,578
checked on Apr 21, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.