Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/14574
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHumphries, Paulen
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, Adamen
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Glennen
dc.contributor.authorEllison, Tanyaen
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-07T08:43:00Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationEcological Applications, 23(1), p. 208-225en
dc.identifier.issn1939-5582en
dc.identifier.issn1051-0761en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/14574-
dc.description.abstractWe present and test an extension of the "match/mismatch" hypothesis that attempts to explain the persistence, under conditions of flow alteration, of small, short-lived, native, riverine, fish species. The premise is that flow alteration typically changes environmental conditions, such as temperature and prey abundance, which may affect survival during the larval period of fishes. This "window-of-opportunity hypothesis" states that, if optimal conditions for recruitment vary temporally within a year, the probability that a proportion of the larvae of protracted-spawning species will encounter a period of optimal conditions is greater than for larvae with only a brief spawning period, and so the former will have a recruitment advantage. We determined whether all hatching events contributed equally to juvenile recruitment of the protracted-spawning Australian smelt ('Retropinna semoni') during one breeding season in three pairs of heavily regulated and largely free-flowing unregulated rivers in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia, and related patterns in the hatch dates of recruits to temperature or prey biomass for one pair. For all rivers, heavily regulated or not, recruits present at the end of the breeding season most commonly hatched in the latter part of the breeding season. Mortality of those fish hatched in the first part of the season likely explains this trend. Furthermore, while hatching times were similar for all rivers, each river showed a distinct pattern of hatching and recruitment, which may relate to the temperature range within which epigenetic processes are aligned. Patterns of zooplankton biomass differed between the largely free-flowing Ovens and regulated Goulburn rivers and likely had different sources: within the channel and within the storage lake, respectively. For the Ovens River, recruits hatched subsequent to the period when the first significant increase in zooplankton biomass occurred. We hypothesize that temperature may largely influence the "window" during which recruitment can take place but that prey density, responding to river-specific interactions between temperature and discharge, plays a role in the timing and magnitude of recruitment of Australian smelt. We conclude that the match/mismatch hypothesis may be applicable to rivers, that the window-of-opportunity hypothesis has some currency and deserves further investigation, and that river regulation may have significant impacts on fish recruitment.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Incen
dc.relation.ispartofEcological Applicationsen
dc.titleRiver regulation and recruitment in a protracted-spawning riverine fishen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1890/11-2255.1en
dc.subject.keywordsConservation and Biodiversityen
dc.subject.keywordsEcosystem Functionen
local.contributor.firstnamePaulen
local.contributor.firstnameAdamen
local.contributor.firstnameGlennen
local.contributor.firstnameTanyaen
local.subject.for2008050202 Conservation and Biodiversityen
local.subject.for2008050102 Ecosystem Functionen
local.subject.seo2008960913 Water Allocation and Quantificationen
local.subject.seo2008960807 Fresh, Ground and Surface Water Flora, Fauna and Biodiversityen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailphumphries@csu.edu.auen
local.profile.emailgwilson7@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20140326-190131en
local.publisher.placeUnited States of Americaen
local.format.startpage208en
local.format.endpage225en
local.identifier.scopusid84875764666en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume23en
local.identifier.issue1en
local.contributor.lastnameHumphriesen
local.contributor.lastnameRichardsonen
local.contributor.lastnameWilsonen
local.contributor.lastnameEllisonen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:gwilson7en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:tellisonen
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:14789en
local.identifier.handlehttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/14574en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleRiver regulation and recruitment in a protracted-spawning riverine fishen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorHumphries, Paulen
local.search.authorRichardson, Adamen
local.search.authorWilson, Glennen
local.search.authorEllison, Tanyaen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2013en
local.subject.for2020410401 Conservation and biodiversityen
local.subject.for2020410203 Ecosystem functionen
local.subject.seo2020180305 Ground water quantification, allocation and impact of depletionen
local.subject.seo2020190211 Water policy (incl. water allocation)en
local.subject.seo2020180303 Fresh, ground and surface water biodiversityen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

40
checked on Nov 30, 2024

Page view(s)

1,260
checked on Sep 17, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.