Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/14215
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSchaefer, Michael Ten
dc.contributor.authorLamb, Daviden
dc.contributor.authorBradbury, Ronalden
local.source.editorEditor(s): Salvatore Baglio, Deniz Gurkanen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-12T11:02:00Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationIEEE Sensors Applications Symposium Proceedings, p. 253-257en
dc.identifier.isbn9781479921799en
dc.identifier.isbn9781479921805en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/14215-
dc.description.abstractActive optical sensors that contain their own modulated light sources are becoming popular for 'sensing' photosynthetically-active biomass in crops and pastures. These sensors detect optical reflectance to derive spectral vegetation indices, such as the normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI), and are subsequently calibrated to measure plant parameters e.g. biomass. However, research has demonstrated the accuracy of the derived measurements can often be improved by including both a spectral index and a corresponding measure of plant height. This paper describes an active, optical sensor that integrates modulated reflectance sensing with the ability to measure (range) the distance between the source and a target surface. Two ranging techniques are evaluated; one based on the inverse square law (ISL) of reflected radiation and another based on a position-sensitive detector (PSD). Both ranging methods proved capable of reliably delineating target distances out to 4.0 m from the source. Over this range, the PSD detector exhibited a distance-invariant RMSE of ± 2.6 cm whilst the ISL method exhibited an almost linear increase in error of ± 25 % of the measured distance to a spectralon target. Application to a vegetative target (Kikuyu grass), demonstrated the ISL ranging method to yield an average RMSE of ± 3.0 cm in the range of 0.60-1.40 m, while the average RMSE of the PSD over a range of 0.50-1.10 m was observed to be ± 10.0 cm. Despite superior accuracy, target reflectance variations may prove problematic in the use of a PSD ranging sensor and requires further investigation.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)en
dc.relation.ispartofIEEE Sensors Applications Symposium Proceedingsen
dc.titleA Comparison of Two Ranging Approaches in an Active, Optical Plant Canopy Sensoren
dc.typeConference Publicationen
dc.relation.conferenceSAS 2014: IEEE Sensors Applications Symposiumen
dc.subject.keywordsAgricultural Spatial Analysis and Modellingen
dc.subject.keywordsClassical and Physical Opticsen
local.contributor.firstnameMichael Ten
local.contributor.firstnameDaviden
local.contributor.firstnameRonalden
local.subject.for2008020501 Classical and Physical Opticsen
local.subject.for2008070104 Agricultural Spatial Analysis and Modellingen
local.subject.seo2008830406 Sown Pastures (excl. Lucerne)en
local.profile.schoolSchool of Science and Technologyen
local.profile.schoolOffice of Faculty of Science, Agriculture, Business and Lawen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Science and Technologyen
local.profile.emailmschaef3@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emaildlamb@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailrbradbu2@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryE1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20140225-182227en
local.date.conference18th - 20th February, 2014en
local.conference.placeQueenstown, New Zealanden
local.publisher.placeLos Alamitos, United States of Americaen
local.format.startpage253en
local.format.endpage257en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.contributor.lastnameSchaeferen
local.contributor.lastnameLamben
local.contributor.lastnameBradburyen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:mschaef3en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:dlamben
dc.identifier.staffune-id:rbradbu2en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:14428en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleA Comparison of Two Ranging Approaches in an Active, Optical Plant Canopy Sensoren
local.output.categorydescriptionE1 Refereed Scholarly Conference Publicationen
local.relation.urlhttp://sensorapps.org/sites/default/files/uploads/SAS-2014_web_program_feb-17.pdfen
local.conference.detailsSAS 2014: IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium, Queenstown, New Zealand, 18th - 20th February, 2014en
local.search.authorSchaefer, Michael Ten
local.search.authorLamb, Daviden
local.search.authorBradbury, Ronalden
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2014en
local.subject.for2020510302 Classical and physical opticsen
local.subject.for2020300206 Agricultural spatial analysis and modellingen
local.subject.seo2020100505 Sown pastures (excl. lucerne)en
local.date.start2014-02-18-
local.date.end2014-02-20-
Appears in Collections:Conference Publication
School of Science and Technology
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

2,818
checked on Jul 2, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.