Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/12192
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNgu, Bingen
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-28T16:04:00Z-
dc.date.issued2002-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Educational Technology, v.3 (1)en
dc.identifier.issn1327-7308en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/12192-
dc.description.abstractThis article compared online instruction and face-to-face instruction at University Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS). Participants were undergraduate full-time students who were enrolled in the Human Resource Development Program. The learning materials used was 'How to write research proposals and reports'; and this represented a subtopic in the 'Research Methods' course. The design of an online learning environment emphasized four types of interaction: learner-content interaction (topic notes), learner-self interaction (multiple exercises), learner-learner interaction and instructor-learner interaction (online discussion on case studies and group project). The 'QuickPlace' software was customized to incorporate the component of multiple choice exercises. This latter was written with html language and linked to the 'QuickPlace'. The face-to-face group attended routine lectures and tutorials on the same topic. Test results indicate that the online discussion assisted students to learn case studies slightly better than the face-to-face instruction. This may due to the above learning interactions that resulted in a greater emphasis on self-oriented and group-oriented learning as compared to an instructor-oriented face-to-face learning experience. However, feedback from the students indicate a need to further improve the design of the online course.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Western Australia, Department of Educationen
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Educational Technologyen
dc.titleOnline Instruction Versus Face-to-Face Instruction At UNIMASen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.subject.keywordsCurriculum and Pedagogy Theory and Developmenten
local.contributor.firstnameBingen
local.subject.for2008130202 Curriculum and Pedagogy Theory and Developmenten
local.subject.seo2008930203 Teaching and Instruction Technologiesen
local.subject.seo2008930102 Learner and Learning Processesen
local.subject.seo2008930201 Pedagogyen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Educationen
local.profile.emailbngu@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20130207-163749en
local.publisher.placeAustraliaen
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume3en
local.identifier.issue1en
local.contributor.lastnameNguen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:bnguen
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:12398en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleOnline Instruction Versus Face-to-Face Instruction At UNIMASen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.relation.urlhttp://education.illinois.edu/ijet/v3n1/ngu/index.htmlen
local.search.authorNgu, Bingen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2002en
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Education
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1,204
checked on Mar 10, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.