Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/12140
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSinha, Priyakanten
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Laliten
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-25T16:14:00Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Remote Sensing, 34(6), p. 2162-2186en
dc.identifier.issn1366-5901en
dc.identifier.issn0143-1161en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/12140-
dc.description.abstractNumerous land-cover change detection techniques have been developed with varying opinions about their appropriateness and success. Decisions on the selection of the most suitable change detection method is often influenced by the study region landscape complexity and the type of data used for analysis. For different climatic areas, the method that suits best the seasonal land-cover change identification remains uncertain. In this study, 11 different binary change detection methods were tested and compared with respect to their capability in detecting land-cover change/no-change information in different seasons. The methods include image differencing (I_Diff), Improved image differencing (Imp_Diff), principal component image differencing (PC_Diff), vegetation index differencing (VI_Diff), change vector analysis (CVA), image ratioing (IR), improved image ratioing (Imp_IR), vegetation index image ratioing (VI_R), multi-date principal component analysis (PCA) using all bands (M_PCA), two-date bands PCA (B_PCA), and two-date vegetation index images PCA (VI_PCA). Multi Date Thematic Mapper (TM) data were used for a wide set of change image generation. A relatively new approach was applied for optimal threshold value determination for the separation of change/no-change areas. Research results indicated that any methods involving TM Band 4 performed better than those using TM Band 3 or 5 on each of the change periods. However, irrespective of the method used, the accuracy assessment and change/no-change validation results from normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)-based techniques outperformed all other tested techniques in the change detection process (overall accuracy >90% and kappa value >0.85 for all six change periods). The image differencing technique was found to be marginally better than PCA and IR in most cases and any of these techniques can be used for change detection. However, because of the simplistic nature and relative ease in identifying both negative and positive changes from difference images, the NDVI differencing technique is recommended for seasonal land-cover change identification in the study region.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Remote Sensingen
dc.titleBinary images in seasonal land-cover change identification: a comparative study in parts of New South Wales, Australiaen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01431161.2012.742214en
dc.subject.keywordsPhotogrammetry and Remote Sensingen
local.contributor.firstnamePriyakanten
local.contributor.firstnameLaliten
local.subject.for2008090905 Photogrammetry and Remote Sensingen
local.subject.seo2008960509 Ecosystem Assessment and Management of Mountain and High Country Environmentsen
local.profile.schoolEnvironmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailpsinha@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emaillkumar@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20121128-114214en
local.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen
local.format.startpage2162en
local.format.endpage2186en
local.identifier.scopusid84870533412en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume34en
local.identifier.issue6en
local.title.subtitlea comparative study in parts of New South Wales, Australiaen
local.contributor.lastnameSinhaen
local.contributor.lastnameKumaren
dc.identifier.staffune-id:psinhaen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:lkumaren
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-9205-756Xen
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:12346en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleBinary images in seasonal land-cover change identificationen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorSinha, Priyakanten
local.search.authorKumar, Laliten
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.identifier.wosid000311557300017en
local.year.published2013en
local.subject.for2020401304 Photogrammetry and remote sensingen
local.subject.seo2020180201 Assessment and management of coastal and estuarine ecosystemsen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

11
checked on Mar 9, 2024

Page view(s)

1,584
checked on Mar 24, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.