Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/11368
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRogers, Lesleyen
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-21T15:44:00Z-
dc.date.issued2003-
dc.identifier.citationCerebrum, v.Fall (October 01)en
dc.identifier.issn1943-3859en
dc.identifier.issn1524-6205en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/11368-
dc.description.abstractFor more than 150 years, scientists have known that the left and right sides of the human brain are not identical. Some structures exist in both hemispheres but differ in size, and many functions are different on the left and the right. We refer to this difference as hemispheric specialization or, more generally, brain lateralization. From the time this lateralization was discovered, it was assumed to be unique to humans. Associated by scientists with our use of language and our ability to make tools, the lateralized brain was seen as humanity's crowning glory, elevating us above all other species. Initially, as we will see, research seemed to bear out this conclusion, but recent discoveries have not been kind to the theory of uniquely human brain lateralization. Some species of parrots are 90 percent left-footed, fish of some species all turn the same way when encountering a barrier (the better to school), and monkeys express fear more strongly on the left sides of their faces. This same research, and a great deal more, has immensely complicated our view of lateralization and its significance for language, movement, emotions, and attention, to name just a few of the affected functions. Popular psychology is rife with interpretations - and misinterpretations - of brain lateralization. You might read that people are either "left- or right-brained," and correspondingly more analytical or intuitive, more cerebral or emotional. You might read, too, that left-handers are right-brained, and vice versa. Further complicating the picture are deep and abiding beliefs about hand preference, including sometimes intense prejudices against left-handed people. At the beginning of the 21st century, the real significance of brain lateralization is still being sought.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherDana Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofCerebrumen
dc.titleSeeking the Right Answers About Right Brain-Left Brainen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.subject.keywordsCentral Nervous Systemen
local.contributor.firstnameLesleyen
local.subject.for2008110903 Central Nervous Systemen
local.subject.seo2008920111 Nervous System and Disordersen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Science and Technologyen
local.profile.emaillrogers@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC2en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordpes:805en
local.publisher.placeUnited States of Americaen
local.identifier.volumeFallen
local.identifier.issueOctober 01en
local.contributor.lastnameRogersen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:lrogersen
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:11567en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleSeeking the Right Answers About Right Brain-Left Brainen
local.output.categorydescriptionC2 Non-Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.relation.urlhttp://www.dana.org/news/cerebrum/detail.aspx?id=2964en
local.search.authorRogers, Lesleyen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2003en
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Science and Technology
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1,480
checked on Mar 31, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.