Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/9721
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRogers, Lesleyen
local.source.editorEditor(s): Yegor B Malashichev and A Wallace Deckelen
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-16T10:38:00Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.citationBehavioural and Morphological Asymmetries in Vertebrates, p. 129-139en
dc.identifier.isbn9781587061059en
dc.identifier.isbn9781601294975en
dc.identifier.isbn1587061058en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/9721-
dc.description.abstractOf the many examples of lateralization in vertebrates some are expressed at the individual level only (i.e., not aligned in the population) and others at both the individual level and population level. This chapter addresses the advantages and disadvantages of both manifestations of lateralization. First, it discusses results of experiments conducted with chicks and marmosets showing that having a lateralized brain enhances an animal's ability to perform more than one task simultaneously. By allocating the processing required for one task (searching for food) to the left hemisphere and that required for the other task (detecting a predator) to the right hemisphere, animals increase their capacity to attend to both tasks at the same time. Since this advantage of having a lateralized brain applies only to the individual and does not require lateralization at the population level, another explanation is needed for the latter. Indeed, population level lateralization would seem to have the disadvantage of, for example, predators exploiting their prey's bias to respond to their presence more readily on the left side. Hence, this apparent disadvantage might have to be counteracted by other distinct advantages of population lateralization. Here the hypothesis that advantages occur in social interactions between lateralized individuals is considered. Some concluding remarks are made about lateralization in primates, and its potential association with social behavior, and the development of lateralization in the chick as a model demonstrating the multiple interactive influences of lateralization.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherLandes Bioscienceen
dc.relation.ispartofBehavioural and Morphological Asymmetries in Vertebratesen
dc.relation.isversionof1en
dc.titleCognitive and Social Advantages of a Lateralized Brainen
dc.typeBook Chapteren
dc.subject.keywordsAnimal Neurobiologyen
local.contributor.firstnameLesleyen
local.subject.for2008060805 Animal Neurobiologyen
local.subject.seo2008970106 Expanding Knowledge in the Biological Sciencesen
local.identifier.epublicationsvtls086615557en
local.profile.schoolSchool of Science and Technologyen
local.profile.emaillrogers@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryB1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordpes:2362en
local.publisher.placeGeorgetown, United States of Americaen
local.identifier.totalchapters14en
local.format.startpage129en
local.format.endpage139en
local.contributor.lastnameRogersen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:lrogersen
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:9912en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleCognitive and Social Advantages of a Lateralized Brainen
local.output.categorydescriptionB1 Chapter in a Scholarly Booken
local.relation.urlhttp://trove.nla.gov.au/work/20184534en
local.relation.urlhttp://www.landesbioscience.com/books/intelligence_unit/id/940/en
local.search.authorRogers, Lesleyen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2006en
Appears in Collections:Book Chapter
School of Science and Technology
Files in This Item:
3 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1,130
checked on Jun 23, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.