1. Research UNE
  2. UNE
  3. Conference Publication
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/9325
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorColbran, Stephenen
local.source.editorEditor(s): G Williams, P Statham, N Brown & B Clelanden
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-31T15:25:00Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationChanging Demands, Changing Directions: Proceedings ascilite Hobart 2011, p. 269-274en
dc.identifier.isbn9781862956445en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/9325-
dc.description.abstractThis study examined students' perceptions of the usefulness of assessment feedback provided by ReMarksPDF and provides a summary of positive and negative aspects of different types of feedback annotations. Students randomly received one of 7 different combinations of feedback. 74.9% of students found ReMarksPDF feedback better than that they have received in the past and 73.2% of students agreed or strongly agreed that other units should adopt the ReMarksPDF system. Students found the mark tally table, assessment rubric, spider chart, spider chart (with average), colour coding and smileys to be significantly valuable feedback in that order of preference. Females gave higher ratings than males on all feedback types, except spider charts, which were equally highly rated by males. Respondents indicated that ReMarksPDF feedback was easy to read and understand and that it was beneficial to have comments appear in a side column note.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Tasmaniaen
dc.relation.ispartofChanging Demands, Changing Directions: Proceedings ascilite Hobart 2011en
dc.titleEvaluation of alternative feedback mechanisms on student engagement with assessment feedbacken
dc.typeConference Publicationen
dc.relation.conferenceASCILITE 2011: 28th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Educationen
dc.subject.keywordsEducational Technology and Computingen
dc.subject.keywordsLaw and Legal Studiesen
local.contributor.firstnameStephenen
local.subject.for2008130306 Educational Technology and Computingen
local.subject.for2008189999 Law and Legal Studies not elsewhere classifieden
local.subject.seo2008939999 Education and Training not elsewhere classifieden
local.profile.schoolSchool of Lawen
local.profile.emailscolbra2@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryE1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20111013-163457en
local.date.conference4th - 7th December, 2011en
local.conference.placeHobart, Australiaen
local.publisher.placeHobart, Australiaen
local.format.startpage269en
local.format.endpage274en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.contributor.lastnameColbranen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:scolbra2en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:9516en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleEvaluation of alternative feedback mechanisms on student engagement with assessment feedbacken
local.output.categorydescriptionE1 Refereed Scholarly Conference Publicationen
local.relation.urlhttp://www.leishman-associates.com.au/ascilite2011/en
local.relation.urlhttp://www.leishman-associates.com.au/ascilite2011/downloads/papers/Colbran-concise.pdfen
local.conference.detailsASCILITE 2011: 28th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, Hobart, Australia, 4th - 7th December, 2011en
local.search.authorColbran, Stephenen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2011en
local.date.start2011-12-04-
local.date.end2011-12-07-
Appears in Collections:Conference Publication
Files in This Item:
4 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

950
checked on Mar 8, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.