Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/8190
Title: True to the power of one? Cognition, argument and reasoning
Contributor(s): Khlentzos, Drew M  (author); Stevenson, Bruce  (author)
Publication Date: 2011
DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X10002992
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/8190
Abstract: While impressed by much of what Mercier & Sperber (M&S) offer through their argumentative hypothesis, we question whether the specific competencies entailed in each system are adequate. In particular, whether system 2 might not require independent reasoning capabilities. We explore the adequacy of the explanations offered for confirmation bias and the Wason selection task.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(2), p. 82-83
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Place of Publication: United Kingdom
ISSN: 1469-1825
0140-525X
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 170202 Decision Making
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 970117 Expanding Knowledge in Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
HERDC Category Description: C2 Non-Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Files in This Item:
3 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

Page view(s)

1,284
checked on Jul 7, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.