Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/8001
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNoble, William Glassen
dc.date.accessioned2011-07-12T11:21:00Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.citationASHA Leader, v.2006 (March)en
dc.identifier.issn1085-9586en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/8001-
dc.description.abstractThe consensus among audiologists is that fitting two hearing aids offers greater benefit than fitting one only. Most forms of hearing impairment affect both ears, so fitting only one hearing aid seems not to make any sense in the great majority of cases. The exception would be where fitting two aids adds to someone's hearing difficulties in the form, for example, of binaural interference-where the input to one ear distorts the combined binaural signal. But such cases are rare. The presumed benefits of bilateral fitting lie in improved directional hearing and related forms of binaural interaction, such as more audible signal (binaural summation), and improved hearing for speech in spatially separated noise. The latter is understood to be largely due to more effective functioning of the so-called head shadow effect. If a signal of interest (a target) is on one side of the head and an interfering noise is on the other side, a person listening with two hearing aids can take advantage of the fact that the aided ear on the same side as the target will be exposed to a better signal-to-noise ratio, because the head itself acts to diffract the higher frequency components of the contralateral noise. Most laboratory evidence bears out these expectations about improved performance with two hearing aids, thus supporting the consensus for fitting two. This evidence is summarized in Dillon (2001). However, a recent report (Arlinger et al., 2003) concludes that there is no robust clinical field evidence supporting a claim for greater benefit from two hearing aids versus one.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherAmerican Speech-Language-Hearing Associationen
dc.relation.ispartofASHA Leaderen
dc.titleBenefits of Fitting One Versus Two Hearing Aidsen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.subject.keywordsSensory Processes, Perception and Performanceen
local.contributor.firstnameWilliam Glassen
local.subject.for2008170112 Sensory Processes, Perception and Performanceen
local.subject.seo2008920107 Hearing, Vision, Speech and Their Disordersen
local.profile.schoolAdministrationen
local.profile.emailwnoble@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC3en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordpes:3473en
local.publisher.placeUnited States of Americaen
local.identifier.volume2006en
local.identifier.issueMarchen
local.contributor.lastnameNobleen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:wnobleen
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:8175en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleBenefits of Fitting One Versus Two Hearing Aidsen
local.output.categorydescriptionC3 Non-Refereed Article in a Professional Journalen
local.relation.urlhttp://www.asha.org/Publications/leader/2006/060321/f060321a.htmen
local.search.authorNoble, William Glassen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2006en
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1,458
checked on May 19, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.