Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/7676
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWillems, Julieen
local.source.editorEditor(s): Noah Riseman, Sue Rechter and Ellen Warneen
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-08T14:52:00Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationLearning, Teaching and Social Justice in Higher Education, p. 1-16en
dc.identifier.isbn9781921775284en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/7676-
dc.description.abstractOnline learning has been touted as one means by which disadvantage for participation in higher education can be overcome. A frequent argument for the provision of online learning is the improvement of equity for those previously excluded from higher education 'due to location, family responsibilities, or disability' (Bishop, 2002, p. 231). However, the notion of equity in educational participation can be conceptualised in different ways. McIntyre et al. (2004, pp. 18-19) delineate five perceptions of equity on the basis of the underlying social paradigm upon which they are based: the conservative view of equity (opportunities are available to every individual in a society, and thus no additional equity strategies are necessary); the neo-conservative view (each individual should be able to realise their economic potential which is enabled by access to courses); the neo-liberalist view (social exclusion is the breakdown between an individual and society, thus equity strategies need to manage diversity); the liberal and liberal humanist view (the education system needs to be accessible to all by the redistribution of resources and the removal of any barriers that may be preventing successful participation); and finally, the socialist or radical socialist view of equity (non-dominant groups should be supported and resourced for social justice). In this paper, equity is viewed to as a social justice issue. That is, educational disadvantage should be acknowledged, and students experiencing disadvantage need to be supported in order to achieve educational outcomes.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Melbourne, eScholarship Research Centre and Australian Catholic University, School of Arts and Sciencesen
dc.relation.ispartofLearning, Teaching and Social Justice in Higher Educationen
dc.relation.isversionof1en
dc.titleTowards a multi-dimensional indicator to understand equity in education: Introducing the Equity Raw-Score Matrixen
dc.typeBook Chapteren
dc.subject.keywordsHigher Educationen
dc.subject.keywordsHuman Rights and Justice Issuesen
local.contributor.firstnameJulieen
local.subject.for2008130103 Higher Educationen
local.subject.for2008220104 Human Rights and Justice Issuesen
local.subject.seo2008939903 Equity and Access to Educationen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Educationen
local.profile.emailjwillem4@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryB1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20110402-143451en
local.publisher.placeMelbourne, Australiaen
local.identifier.totalchapters17en
local.format.startpage1en
local.format.endpage16en
local.title.subtitleIntroducing the Equity Raw-Score Matrixen
local.contributor.lastnameWillemsen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:jwillem4en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:7847en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleTowards a multi-dimensional indicator to understand equity in educationen
local.output.categorydescriptionB1 Chapter in a Scholarly Booken
local.relation.urlhttp://www.msp.unimelb.edu.au/index.php/LTSJHE/article/view/272en
local.relation.urlhttp://trove.nla.gov.au/work/151080894en
local.relation.urlhttp://books.google.com.au/books?id=3mlzZNUNQxwC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA1en
local.search.authorWillems, Julieen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2010en
Appears in Collections:Book Chapter
School of Education
Files in This Item:
3 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.