Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/7449
Title: Introduction and Overview
Contributor(s): Davidson, Iain  (author)orcid ; Nowell, April (author)
Publication Date: 2010
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/7449
Abstract: In the 1960s Mary and Louis Leakey uncovered 1.8 million-year-old stone tools at the site of Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania. These tools, which archaeologists called the Oldowan industry, were later associated with 'Homo habilis', the first member of the genus 'Homo'. This was a significant discovery because relative to older hominin species that were not thought to be tool users, 'H. habilis' had a larger brain size and possessed anatomical features reminiscent of later species (e.g., reduced molar size, flatter face). Increasing cranial capacity, tool use, and more modern-looking features fit together in the story of what made humans unique. In fact, for the first time the use of material culture was included in the official definition of a species (Leakey, Tobias, and Napier 1964) - and thus the phrase "Man the Tool Maker" was coined (Oakley 1952). Since that time, our knowledge of the relationship between stone tools and the evolving human brain has grown and the resulting picture is predictably more complex. The earliest known stone tools now date to approximately 2.7 to 2.5 million years ago (mya) (Semaw 2000) whereas hominin evolution can be traced back using the fossil record to between 7.0 and 6.0 mya (see Wood 2002). Researchers question whether the "sudden" appearance of the Oldowan is the result of a dramatic change in cognitive abilities or the transition to a more archaeologically visible medium. One way to think about this is to consider the niche that was opened by the use of stone tools. Davidson and McGrew (2005; see also Davidson, Chapter 9) have suggested that the permanence of stone tools and the products of knapping on the landscape made a distinctive difference to the pattern of cognitive evolution. It also seems likely that 'H. habilis' was not the only stone tool maker and user. Depending on how many species one recognizes between 2.5 and 1.5 mya, up to as many as eight hominin species have been found in direct or indirect association with stone tools (Toth and Schick, 2005). In addition, there is now good evidence that early hominins were using bone tools (Backwell and d'Errico 2001, 2008).
Publication Type: Book Chapter
Source of Publication: Stone Tools and the Evolution of Human Cognition, p. 1-11
Publisher: University Press of Colorado
Place of Publication: Boulder, United States of America
ISBN: 9781607320319
9781607320302
1607320304
Field of Research (FOR): 210104 Archaeology of Australia (excl Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander)
210105 Archaeology of Europe, the Mediterranean and the Levant
210103 Archaeology of Asia, Africa and the Americas
210102 Archaeological Science
179999 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences not elsewhere classified
Socio-Economic Outcome Codes: 950503 Understanding Australias Past
950501 Understanding Africas Past
950502 Understanding Asias Past
HERDC Category Description: B1 Chapter in a Scholarly Book
Other Links: http://trove.nla.gov.au/work/37007490
http://www.upcolorado.com/book/Stone_Tools_and_the_Evolution_of_Human_Cognition_Cloth
Statistics to Oct 2018: Visitors: 252
Views: 268
Downloads: 0
Appears in Collections:Book Chapter

Files in This Item:
3 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

Page view(s)

48
checked on Feb 8, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.