Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/7426
Title: | Assessing Binaural Hearing: Results Using the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale | Contributor(s): | Noble, William G (author) | Publication Date: | 2010 | DOI: | 10.3766/jaaa.21.9.2 | Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/7426 | Abstract: | Background: Binaural hearing is important for hearing target signals against competing ones, and for spatial hearing. Purpose: Survey of results using the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale (SSQ), a measure emphasizing contexts that rely on binaural hearing ability. Results show that self-rating can identify binaural hearing influences and benefits. Research Designs: Retrospective design compared fitting with one versus two hearing aids. Prospective design compared one versus two cochlear implants. Brief descriptions are made of studies using other comparative designs. Study Samples: There were 69 new adult-age clients of an audiology clinic with unilateral hearing aid fittings, 34 with bilateral (and n = 63 in a pre-aided sample); there were 14 people with one cochlear implant (CI), 18 with two; in both CI groups, age ranged from 20 to 90 yr. Data Collection and Analysis: The data are scores on the 49 items comprising the SSQ, grouped into 10 "pragmatic" subscales, analyzed using t-tests and ANOVA. Results: Two aids offer advantage for challenging conditions (e.g., multistream signal monitoring), for dynamic spatial hearing, and in reducing listening effort. These outcomes are observable, though less distinctly, in one versus two implants. Overall advantage of two implants is very clear in a 20-59-yr-old cohort of patients. Recent application and development of the SSQ indicates sensitivity to subtle differences in abilities. Conclusions: Self-report data are valuable in revealing the everyday listening domains in which improvement in binaural hearing function provides beneficial outcomes. | Publication Type: | Journal Article | Source of Publication: | Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 21(9), p. 568-574 | Publisher: | American Academy of Audiology | Place of Publication: | United States of America | ISSN: | 2157-3107 1050-0545 |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: | 110321 Rehabilitation and Therapy (excl Physiotherapy) 170112 Sensory Processes, Perception and Performance |
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: | 920107 Hearing, Vision, Speech and Their Disorders | Peer Reviewed: | Yes | HERDC Category Description: | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal |
---|---|
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format |
---|
SCOPUSTM
Citations
28
checked on Jul 20, 2024
Page view(s)
1,366
checked on Jan 14, 2024
Download(s)
4
checked on Jan 14, 2024
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.