Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/7325
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorConroy, Mark Aen
dc.contributor.authorCupples, Lindaen
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-06T11:44:00Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationStudies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(4), p. 523-552en
dc.identifier.issn1470-1545en
dc.identifier.issn0272-2631en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/7325-
dc.description.abstractThis study investigated sentence-processing strategies adopted by advanced nonnative speakers (NNSs) and native speakers (NSs) of English in the context of an English structure with which NNSs reportedly have an acquisition difficulty (e.g., Swan & Smith, 2001) - namely, modal perfect (MP). Participants read MP sentences such as 'He could have worked at the shoe factory' and closely related analogous sentences (e.g., 'He could have work at the shoe factory'), and reading times and errors were measured in an online grammaticality-judgment task. It was hypothesized that NSs would have a processing preference for MP sentences compared to the analogues, reflecting the primacy of syntactic information in NS processing and a preference for late closure, whereas NNSs would show no such preference because they rely less on syntactic information when processing sentences. The results revealed, however, that both NSs and NNSs read MP sentences more quickly and with fewer errors than the closely related analogues, consistent with a processing preference for MP sentences. Both groups were also influenced by word-category frequency information, which moderated, but did not fundamentally alter, their syntactic preference for MP. The significance of these findings is discussed in terms of models of second-language sentence processing and NNSs' reported MP acquisition difficulty.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofStudies in Second Language Acquisitionen
dc.titleWe could have loved and lost, or we never could have love at all: Syntactic Misanalysis in L2 Sentence Processingen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0272263110000252en
dc.subject.keywordsApplied Linguistics and Educational Linguisticsen
dc.subject.keywordsLinguistic Processes (incl Speech Production and Comprehension)en
local.contributor.firstnameMark Aen
local.contributor.firstnameLindaen
local.subject.for2008170204 Linguistic Processes (incl Speech Production and Comprehension)en
local.subject.for2008200401 Applied Linguistics and Educational Linguisticsen
local.subject.seo2008930102 Learner and Learning Processesen
local.subject.seo2008950202 Languages and Literacyen
local.subject.seo2008930201 Pedagogyen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciencesen
local.profile.schoolLinguisticsen
local.profile.emailmconroy2@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emaillinda.cupples@mq.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20110110-152242en
local.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen
local.format.startpage523en
local.format.endpage552en
local.identifier.scopusid79951826884en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume32en
local.identifier.issue4en
local.title.subtitleSyntactic Misanalysis in L2 Sentence Processingen
local.contributor.lastnameConroyen
local.contributor.lastnameCupplesen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:mconroy2en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:7493en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleWe could have loved and lost, or we never could have love at allen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorConroy, Mark Aen
local.search.authorCupples, Lindaen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2010en
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Files in This Item:
3 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Jul 20, 2024

Page view(s)

1,066
checked on Nov 26, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.