Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/7261
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTabolt, Katieen
dc.contributor.authorWerren, Julia Cen
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-02T12:02:00Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationTort Law Review, 18(2), p. 76-88en
dc.identifier.issn1039-3285en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/7261-
dc.description.abstractThis article critically analyses the relationship between wrongful birth and Sullivan v Gordon type claims in New South Wales. Although somewhat different in nature, both types of claims may relate to care expenses associated with children born as a result of another's negligence. The authors explore the legal, ethical and social issues that have been discussed extensively in cases such as Cattanach v Melchior (2003) 215 CLR 1, Sullivan v Gordon (1999) 47 NSWLR 319 and CSR Ltd v Eddy (2005) 226 CLR 1. The legislative provisions in New South Wales are then considered and an assessment made whether the legislature contemplated all the relevant issues as discussed in such cases. The authors argue that both s 15B and s 71 of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) should be reformulated to allow care expenses to be claimed for children who are born as a result of the negligence of another and that Sullivan v Gordon claims and wrongful birth claims should be treated consistently under the legislation.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherLawbook Coen
dc.relation.ispartofTort Law Reviewen
dc.titleWrongful birth and Sullivan v Gordon damages claims: An argument for consistency and reform in New South Walesen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.subject.keywordsTort Lawen
local.contributor.firstnameKatieen
local.contributor.firstnameJulia Cen
local.subject.for2008180126 Tort Lawen
local.subject.seo2008940112 Families and Family Servicesen
local.subject.seo2008940105 Childrens/Youth Services and Childcareen
local.subject.seo2008929999 Health not elsewhere classifieden
local.profile.schoolSchool of Lawen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Lawen
local.profile.emailjwerren@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20110331-140332en
local.publisher.placeAustraliaen
local.format.startpage76en
local.format.endpage88en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume18en
local.identifier.issue2en
local.title.subtitleAn argument for consistency and reform in New South Walesen
local.contributor.lastnameTabolten
local.contributor.lastnameWerrenen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:jwerrenen
local.profile.orcid0000-0001-6750-5212en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:7429en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleWrongful birth and Sullivan v Gordon damages claimsen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorTabolt, Katieen
local.search.authorWerren, Julia Cen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2010en
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Files in This Item:
3 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1,448
checked on Oct 8, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.