1. Research UNE
  2. UNE
  3. Journal Article
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/6196
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGhosh, Ericen
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-16T09:23:00Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationOxford Journal of Legal Studies, 30(2), p. 327-359en
dc.identifier.issn1464-3820en
dc.identifier.issn0143-6503en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/6196-
dc.description.abstractThe literature on the democratic legitimacy of judicial review and also on institutionalizing deliberative democracy neglects the possibility of employing juries rather than judges to determine bill-of-rights matters. This neglect is unfortunate, for there are findings emerging especially from deliberative polling that support the feasibility of such juries. Such feasibility would raise a new countermajoritarian concern with judicial review. The argument supporting this new concern also casts fresh light on the traditional countermajoritarian concern.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofOxford Journal of Legal Studiesen
dc.titleDeliberative Democracy and the Countermajoritarian Difficulty: Considering Constitutional Juriesen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ojls/gqq011en
dc.subject.keywordsLegal Theory, Jurisprudence and Legal Interpretationen
dc.subject.keywordsConstitutional Lawen
local.contributor.firstnameEricen
local.subject.for2008180122 Legal Theory, Jurisprudence and Legal Interpretationen
local.subject.for2008180108 Constitutional Lawen
local.subject.seo2008940203 Political Systemsen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Lawen
local.profile.emaileghosh@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20100601-15354en
local.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen
local.format.startpage327en
local.format.endpage359en
local.identifier.scopusid77954199982en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume30en
local.identifier.issue2en
local.title.subtitleConsidering Constitutional Juriesen
local.contributor.lastnameGhoshen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:eghoshen
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-5203-4638en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:6353en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleDeliberative Democracy and the Countermajoritarian Difficultyen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorGhosh, Ericen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.identifier.wosid000289289000006en
local.year.published2010en
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

25
checked on Jan 18, 2025

Page view(s)

972
checked on Mar 7, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.