Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/61951
Title: Resilience@Work Mindfulness Program: Results From a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial With First Responders
Contributor(s): Joyce, Sadhbh (author); Shand, Fiona (author); Lal, Tara J  (author)orcid ; Mott, Brendan (author); Bryant, Richard A (author); Harvey, Samuel B (author)
Publication Date: 2019-02-19
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.2196/12894
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/61951
Abstract: 

Background: A growing body of research suggests that resilience training can play a pivotal role in creating mentally healthy workplaces, particularly with regard to protecting the long-term well-being of workers. Emerging research describes positive outcomes from various types of resilience training programs (RTPs) among different occupational groups. One specific group of workers that may benefit from this form of proactive resilience training is first responders. Given the nature of their work, first responders are frequently exposed to stressful circumstances and potentially traumatic events, which may impact their overall resilience and well-being over time.

Objective: This study aimed to examine whether a mindfulness-based RTP (the Resilience@Work [RAW] Mindfulness Program) delivered via the internet can effectively enhance resilience among a group of high-risk workers.

Methods: We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) comprising 24 Primary Fire and Rescue and Hazmat stations within New South Wales. Overall, 12 stations were assigned to the 6-session RAW Mindfulness Program and 12 stations were assigned to the control condition. A total of 143 active full-time firefighters enrolled in the study. Questionnaires were administered at baseline, immediately post training, and at 6-month follow-up. Measurements examined change in both adaptive and bounce-back resilience as well as several secondary outcomes examining resilience resources and acceptance and mindfulness skills.

Results: Mixed-model repeated measures analysis found that the overall test of group-by-time interaction was significant (P=.008), with the intervention group increasing in adaptive resilience over time. However, no significant differences were found between the intervention group and the control group in terms of change in bounce-back resilience (P=.09). At 6-month follow-up, the group receiving the RAW intervention had an average increase in their resilience score of 1.3, equating to a moderate-to-large effect size compared with the control group of 0.73 (95% CI 0.38-1.06). Per-protocol analysis found that compared with the control group, the greatest improvements in adaptive resilience were observed among those who completed most of the RAW program, that is, 5 to 6 sessions (P=.002).

Conclusions: The results of this RCT suggest that mindfulness-based resilience training delivered in an internet format can create improvements in adaptive resilience and related resources among high-risk workers, such as first responders. Despite a number of limitations, the results of this study suggest that the RAW Mindfulness Program is an effective, scalable, and practical means of delivering online resilience training in high-risk workplace settings. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time a mindfulness-based RTP delivered entirely via the internet has been tested in the workplace.

Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(2), p. 1-17
Publisher: JMIR Publications, Inc
Place of Publication: Canada
ISSN: 1438-8871
1439-4456
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 420603 Health promotion
520304 Health psychology
520302 Clinical psychology
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 200305 Mental health services
200409 Mental health
200408 Injury prevention and control
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Health

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/ResilienceJoyce2019JournalArticle.pdfPublished Version1.26 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

53
checked on Jan 4, 2025
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons