Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/61630
Title: Broadening the scope of empirical studies to answer persistent questions in landscape-moderated effects on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning
Contributor(s): Perovic, David J  (author)orcid ; Gámez-Virués, Sagrario (author); Landis, Douglas A (author); Tscharntke, Teja (author); Zalucki, Myron P (author); Saura, Santiago (author); Furlong, Michael J (author); Desneux, Nicolas (author); Sciarretta, Andrea (author); Balkenhol, Niko (author); Schmidt, Jason M (author); Trematerra, Pasquale (author); Westphal, Catrin (author)
Publication Date: 2021
Early Online Version: 2021
DOI: 10.1016/bs.aecr.2021.10.003
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/61630
Abstract: 

Despite a developing understanding of how landscape level processes moderate biodiversity patterns and ecosystem functioning, key questions remain unresolved, therefore limiting our ability to manage for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem functioning at the most appropriate scales. These questions have remained unanswered because studies in agricultural landscapes generally over-emphasize alpha diversity within managed land uses, and are focused at scales that are irrelevant to species studied. We argue that the key to resolving unanswered questions in landscape-moderated effects on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning lies in establishing the distribution of available species and functions across the landscape and between land uses, and in understanding how this distribution of species varies with changing landscape context. We emphasize the need for studies that empirically test the mechanisms underpinning landscape-moderated effects on biodiversity and ecosystem function and link these with ecosystem service delivery. We facilitate this approach by outlining the empirical investigations that will lead to a better understanding of biodiversity patterns and ecosystem functioning at the landscape scale, and we highlight statistical approaches to support these different approaches to sampling. Our paper is divided in four sections: (A) we identify where and why gaps exist in our mechanistic understanding of landscape level processes, by reviewing current hypotheses" (B) we outline why, and how, landscape level research would benefit from shifting the focus to the distribution and partitioning of species and functions within a landscape" (C) we outline why, and how, larger scale processes, such as dispersal and meta-population dynamics need to be addressed in a more interactive fashion" and finally, (D) we round out by highlighting the experimental settings where landscape effects most urgently need testing.

Publication Type: Book Chapter
Source of Publication: Advances in Ecological Research, v.65, p. 109-131
Publisher: Elsevier Ltd
Place of Publication: United Kingdom
ISBN: 9780323915038
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 410206 Landscape ecology
HERDC Category Description: B1 Chapter in a Scholarly Book
Editor: Editor(s): David A. Bohan, Alex J. Dumbrell, and, Adam J. Vanbergen
Appears in Collections:Book Chapter
School of Environmental and Rural Science

Show full item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.