Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/59371
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Abby Elizabehen
dc.contributor.authorBickel, Danielen
dc.contributor.authorRader, Rominaen
dc.contributor.authorSaunders, Manuen
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Lena Aliceen
dc.contributor.authorSpurr, Cameronen
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-17T05:22:27Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-17T05:22:27Z-
dc.date.created2023-12-
dc.date.issued2024-05-09-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/59371-
dc.descriptionPlease contact rune@une.edu.au if you require access to this thesis for the purpose of research or study.en
dc.description.abstract<p>Global agricultural crop production has become increasingly pollinator-dependant. Eusocial bee taxa within the family Apidae (e.g., honey bees, bumble bees, stingless bees) are wellestablished, successful crop pollinators globally. In particular, the ubiquity and wellestablished management of the European honey bee (<i>Apis mellifera</i> Linnaeus, 1758) has resulted in an overreliance of this pollinator worldwide. As other non-bee insects are also effective pollinators, it has become increasingly important to better understand the capability and life history needs of non-bee pollinator taxa so they can provide alternative, or supplementary, pollination services to managed bees and be supported within the landscape. This will ensure that consistent and reliable pollination services continue to be supplied to agricultural systems. This thesis investigates the pollination effectiveness and reproductive needs of the second most important pollinator taxon behind bees, the flies (Diptera), in pollinator-dependant food crops.</p> <p>First, I conducted a systematic literature review on the diets and habitat needs of 431 crop flower-visiting fly species found globally and collated the existing information into a database. I was able to document the diets and habitat needs of 242 crop-visiting fly species (24 families and 119 genera) inhabiting all eight global biogeographical regions. I found that these crop-visiting fly species live in 35 different natural habitats and belong to 10 different feeding guilds. The results of this review identified major gaps in our understanding of the life history needs of crop-pollinating flies. In particular, current floral management schemes are largely focused on the resource needs of bees. As flies require other non-floral habitats to complete their life cycles, the diverse life history needs of flies and other non-bee taxa are not currently supported by existing pollinator management practices.</p> <p>Second, I investigated the identity and efficiency of floral visitors to carrot seed crops. To do this, I conducted floral field surveys and pollen deposition trials across two years (2020-21) within varying environmental conditions in the Riverina region of New South Wales (NSW). I conducted 268 floral visitation surveys and identified 53 different insects (26 families) as floral visitors of seed carrot in temperatures ranging from 10.5ºC to 39.5 ºC and in 19.7% to 94.7% relative humidity. Spatial and temporal complementarity was observed across all dominant taxonomic groups (ladybeetles, bees, flies). Wild taxa generally matched managed honey bees in terms of abundance and their capability to transfer pollen between carrot parent lines. Further, wild taxa, not managed European honey bees deployed for pollination services, are providing the bulk of pollination services to Australian hybrid seed carrot.</p> <p>Third, I determined the oviposition and habitat needs of pollinating hoverflies (Syrphidae: Eristalini). I did this by deploying 14 portable pools filled with soil and decaying vegetation across four seed carrot sites in the Riverina (NSW) region of Australia. All pools successfully supported the immature stages (eggs and larvae) of hoverflies after 12 to 21 days, and two beneficial species of flies were reared from the pools: <i>Eristalinus punctulatus</i> and <i>Eristalis tenax</i> (Linnaeus, 1758). Both species were effective pollinators of seed carrot in Chapters Three and Four of this thesis, respectively. These results suggest that deploying portable habitat pools filled with decaying plant materials in agroecosystems may be a successful management intervention to rapidly facilitate hoverfly pollinator reproduction.</p> <p>Fourth, I assessed the effectiveness of the Australasian endemic golden native dronefly <i>Eristalinus punctulatus</i> (Macquart, 1847), at transferring pollen to hybrid seed carrot flowers. While both honey bees and the native drone fly were capable of depositing pollen onto seed carrot floral stigmas, golden native drone flies on average deposited more pollen onto stigmas than European honeybees. I also observed the first recorded event of natural oviposition of this fly species on the Mid North Coast (NSW) region. When observing the oviposition of this fly, I found that they oviposited within discarded raspberry plant root balls at a commercial berry farm. This observation, coupled with their demonstrated pollination effectiveness in seed carrot, suggests that these endemic flies could be supported as potential pollinators by deploying non-floral habitat within agroecosystems.</p> <p>Finally, I compared the pollination effectiveness and activity patterns of two managed fly pollinators and two managed bee species at commercial raspberry and blackberry farms in two major berry growing regions in Australia: Mid North Coast (NSW) and Northern Tasmania (TAS). All taxa were capable of effectively pollinating raspberry and blackberry after one visit to a flower; however, the quality, weight, and number of pollinated drupelets per fruit varied depending on the taxa tested. In small cages, <i>E. tenax</i> and wild taxa pollinated raspberry fruits that weighed significantly more and were of higher quality than fruits harvested from <i>C. stygia</i> cages; however, there were no significant differences in the quality, weight, and number of pollinated drupelets in blackberry across all taxa. Further, in a blackberry polytunnel in Tasmania, <i>E. tenax</i> flies were significantly more active than European honey bees, and the fruits harvested from the <i>E. tenax</i> polytunnel did not differ from fruits visited by honey bees. These results demonstrate that some fly species could be effective supplementary, or alternative, pollinators to managed bees in commercial raspberry and blackberry.</p> <p>This thesis demonstrates the importance of understanding how wild taxa, like flies and non-<i>Apis</i> bees, contribute to pollination service delivery, and how best to support these taxa within agroecosystems. Some flies and other wild taxa can provide significant and effective pollination services to some crops. If supported with foraging and habitat needs, these taxa may be able to provide similar pollination services to the honey bees used within these systems. Identifying wild pollinator taxa and their life history needs, assessing their capability as pollinators in a variety of crop systems, developing rearing techniques to commercialize effective taxa, and methods to support effective wild and managed pollinator assemblages within agroecosystems, are all important next steps to improve pollination services and yields of pollinator-dependant cropping systems globally.</p>en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherUniversity of New England-
dc.relation.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/59373en
dc.titleFly (Diptera) Pollination Efficiency and Reproductive Needs within Crop Agroecosystemsen
dc.typeThesis Doctoralen
local.contributor.firstnameAbby Elizabehen
local.contributor.firstnameDanielen
local.contributor.firstnameRominaen
local.contributor.firstnameManuen
local.contributor.firstnameLena Aliceen
local.contributor.firstnameCameronen
local.relation.isfundedbyARCen
local.hos.emailers-sabl@une.edu.auen
local.thesis.passedPasseden
local.thesis.degreelevelDoctoralen
local.thesis.degreenameDoctor of Philosophy - PhDen
local.contributor.grantorUniversity of New England-
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailadavis63@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emaildbickel@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailrrader@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailmsaund28@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emaillschmidt@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryT2en
local.grant.numberFT210100851en
local.access.restrictedto2025-02-10en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeArmidale, Australia-
local.contributor.lastnameDavisen
local.contributor.lastnameBickelen
local.contributor.lastnameRaderen
local.contributor.lastnameSaundersen
local.contributor.lastnameSchmidten
local.contributor.lastnameSpurren
dc.identifier.staffune-id:adavis63en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:dbickelen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:rraderen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:msaund28en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:lschmidten
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-0942-8439en
local.profile.orcid0000-0001-9056-9118en
local.profile.orcid0000-0003-0645-8277en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.rolesupervisoren
local.profile.rolesupervisoren
local.profile.rolesupervisoren
local.profile.rolesupervisoren
local.profile.rolesupervisoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/59371en
dc.identifier.academiclevelStudenten
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.thesis.bypublicationYesen
local.title.maintitleFly (Diptera) Pollination Efficiency and Reproductive Needs within Crop Agroecosystemsen
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteThe Horticulture Innovation Australia Limited Project titled “Managing Flies for Crop Pollination (PH16002)”en
local.output.categorydescriptionT2 Thesis - Doctorate by Researchen
local.relation.grantdescriptionARC/FT210100851en
local.relation.doi10.3390/insects14050439en
local.relation.doi10.1002/eap.2859en
local.relation.doi10.1002/2688-8319.12290en
local.access.yearsrestricted0.75en
local.school.graduationSchool of Environmental & Rural Scienceen
local.thesis.borndigitalYes-
local.search.authorDavis, Abby Elizabehen
local.search.supervisorBickel, Danielen
local.search.supervisorRader, Rominaen
local.search.supervisorSaunders, Manuen
local.search.supervisorSchmidt, Lena Aliceen
local.search.supervisorSpurr, Cameronen
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.year.conferred2024en
local.subject.for2020310302 Community ecology (excl. invasive species ecology)en
local.subject.for2020410203 Ecosystem functionen
local.subject.for2020410204 Ecosystem services (incl. pollination)en
local.subject.seo2020100407 Insectsen
local.subject.seo2020180601 Assessment and management of terrestrial ecosystemsen
local.subject.seo2020260503 Berry fruit (excl. kiwifruit)en
local.profile.affiliationtypeUnknownen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
Appears in Collections:School of Environmental and Rural Science
Thesis Doctoral
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

798
checked on Nov 17, 2024

Download(s)

8
checked on Nov 17, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.