Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/56429
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFadgen, Timen
dc.contributor.authorCharlton, Guyen
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-27T02:04:15Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-27T02:04:15Z-
dc.date.issued2023-08-04-
dc.identifier.citationUniversity of Florida Journal of Law & Public Policy, 33(2), p. 1-22en
dc.identifier.issn1942-8626en
dc.identifier.issn1047-8035en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/56429-
dc.description.abstract<p>This Article considers the problematic notion of citizenship rights among colonized Pacific Island Peoples since the nineteenth century. In particular, this Article reviews these rights for American Samoans in light of the recent Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals decision <i>Fitisemanu v. United States.</i> In <i>Fitisemanu</i>, the Tenth Circuit, relying on a repurposed notion of the Insular Cases, denied American citizenship rights to native born American Samoans despite the guarantees extended to individuals "born or naturalized in the United States" under the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The Article argues that this decision inappropriately narrowed the application of the Fourteenth Amendment with its extended application of the Insular Cases' fact-based "impractical and anomalous" inquiry to conclude the federal government's efforts to provide local government and <i>fa'a Samoa</i> was in effect a recognition of American Samoa's right of self-determination such that the objections of the territorial government to these citizenship rights militated against the recognition of citizenship. In the process of this discussion, this Article considers how substantially similar issues regarding New Zealand and British citizenship were implicated in the context of Western Samoa in <i>Lesa v. Attorney General of New Zealand.</i> The circumstances surrounding these cases involve similar legal and policy arguments which have perpetuated the "subject" status of colonized peoples and the initial denial of equality and citizenship rights. This underscores the historical resistance of colonial states to extend full membership rights to their colonized subjects. We contend that the effect of the Insular Cases' framework, despite claims to the contrary, has not protected Indigenous culture from American cultural and constitutional hegemony but continues to deny full legal membership into the political community that enjoys full sovereignty over the land of their birth.</p>en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Florida, Levin College of Lawen
dc.relation.ispartofUniversity of Florida Journal of Law & Public Policyen
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.titleNeither Within Nor Without: The Curious Case of U.S. Citizenship in American Samoa and the Insular Casesen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dcterms.accessRightsBronzeen
local.contributor.firstnameTimen
local.contributor.firstnameGuyen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Lawen
local.profile.emailgcharlt3@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeUnited States of Americaen
local.format.startpage1en
local.format.endpage22en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume33en
local.identifier.issue2en
local.title.subtitleThe Curious Case of U.S. Citizenship in American Samoa and the Insular Casesen
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameFadgenen
local.contributor.lastnameCharltonen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:gcharlt3en
local.profile.orcid0000-0003-2292-7811en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/56429en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleNeither Within Nor Withouten
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorFadgen, Timen
local.search.authorCharlton, Guyen
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.year.published2023-
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/b5b5bf7a-def4-4502-9146-bb16322f8099en
local.subject.for2020480302 Comparative lawen
local.subject.seo2020280114 Expanding knowledge in Indigenous studiesen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Law
Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

396
checked on Apr 28, 2024

Download(s)

4
checked on Apr 28, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons