Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/55980
Title: An Award of Damages for Commercial Surrogacy Overseas?
Contributor(s): De Souza, Michelle  (author)orcid 
Publication Date: 2023-05
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/55980
Abstract: 

This article examines the United Kingdom Supreme Court decision in Whittington Hospital NHS Trust v XX [2020] UKSC 14. The case centred on whether damages could be awarded for the cost of a commercial surrogacy arrangement in California, following clinical negligence by the hospital that left the plaintiff unable to carry her own children. After examination of this case, the article outlines and compares the United Kingdom and Australian surrogacy laws. It then discusses how a similar case would be decided in Australia and argues that the result would be the same in some Australian States. It also discusses the concept of reproductive autonomy and the importance of this concept when considering cases involving the loss of fertility.

Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Journal of Law and Medicine, 30(1), p. 166-178
Publisher: Lawbook Co
Place of Publication: Australia
ISSN: 1320-159X
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 480412 Medical and health law
480605 Tort law
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 230405 Law reform
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Law

Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show full item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.