Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/5045
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDunn, Camille Cen
dc.contributor.authorNoble, William Gen
dc.contributor.authorTyler, Richard Sen
dc.contributor.authorKordus, Monikaen
dc.contributor.authorGantz, Bruce Jen
dc.contributor.authorJi, Haihongen
dc.date.accessioned2010-03-11T15:52:00Z
dc.date.issued2009en
dc.identifier.citationEar and Hearing, 31(2), p. 296-298en
dc.identifier.issn0196-0202en
dc.identifier.issn1538-4667en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/5045en
dc.description.abstractObjective: Compare speech performance in noise with matched bilateral cochlear implant (ClCl) and unilateral cochlear implant (Cl only) users. Design: Thirty CICI and 30 CI-only subjects were tested on a battery of speech perception tests in noise that use an eight-loudspeaker array. Results: On average, ClCl subject's performance with speech in noise was significantly better than the Cl-only subjects. Conclusion: The CICI group showed significantly better performance on speech perception in noise compared with the CI-only subjects, supporting the hypothesis that CICI is more beneficial than CI only.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen
dc.relation.ispartofEar and Hearingen
dc.titleBilateral and Unilateral Cochlear Implant Users Compared on Speech Perception in Noiseen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181c12383en
dc.subject.keywordsRehabilitation and Therapy (excl Physiotherapy)en
local.contributor.firstnameCamille Cen
local.contributor.firstnameWilliam Gen
local.contributor.firstnameRichard Sen
local.contributor.firstnameMonikaen
local.contributor.firstnameBruce Jen
local.contributor.firstnameHaihongen
local.subject.for2008110321 Rehabilitation and Therapy (excl Physiotherapy)en
local.subject.seo2008920107 Hearing, Vision, Speech and Their Disordersen
local.profile.schoolAdministrationen
local.profile.emailwnoble@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20100208-135645en
local.publisher.placeUnited States of Americaen
local.format.startpage296en
local.format.endpage298en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume31en
local.identifier.issue2en
local.contributor.lastnameDunnen
local.contributor.lastnameNobleen
local.contributor.lastnameTyleren
local.contributor.lastnameKordusen
local.contributor.lastnameGantzen
local.contributor.lastnameJien
dc.identifier.staffune-id:wnobleen
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:5163en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleBilateral and Unilateral Cochlear Implant Users Compared on Speech Perception in Noiseen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.description.statisticsepubsVisitors: 245<br />Views: 262<br />Downloads: 0en
local.search.authorDunn, Camille Cen
local.search.authorNoble, William Gen
local.search.authorTyler, Richard Sen
local.search.authorKordus, Monikaen
local.search.authorGantz, Bruce Jen
local.search.authorJi, Haihongen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2009en
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Files in This Item:
3 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

42
checked on Nov 30, 2018

Page view(s)

72
checked on Mar 2, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.