Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||An intersectoral comparison of Australian water reforms||Contributor(s):||Crase, Lin (author); Dollery, Brian Edward (author); Byrnes, Joel David (author)||Publication Date:||2008||DOI:||10.2166/wp.2007.031||Handle Link:||https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/4656||Abstract:||Reformation of the policies for allocating Australia's water resources has now assumed profound political, economic and social significance. However, there are marked contrasts between urban and agricultural sectors, in the approach to policy reform. Whereas governments have embarked on a range of mandated initiatives to alter or constrain the behaviour of urban dwellers, the approach adopted for irrigated agriculture has been characterised by an emphasis on markets and private property rights. This paper explores the extent of these disparate and potentially incongruous policies by focussing primarily on the states with the largest irrigation sectors, New South Wales and Victoria. Whilst acknowledging the high transaction costs of individual households engaging in a water market, the paper argues for more liberal market participation by urban water authorities on behalf of their constituents. The paper also calls for more rigorous economic assessment of the plethora of water-saving and demand-management strategies being proposed in the urban water setting.||Publication Type:||Journal Article||Source of Publication:||Water Policy, 10(1), p. 43-56||Publisher:||IWA Publishing||Place of Publication:||London, United Kingdom||ISSN:||1366-7017||Field of Research (FOR):||140214 Public Economics- Publically Provided Goods||Peer Reviewed:||Yes||HERDC Category Description:||C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal||Statistics to Oct 2018:||Visitors: 235
|Appears in Collections:||Journal Article|
Files in This Item:
checked on Nov 30, 2018
checked on Mar 5, 2019
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.