Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/4174
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNarwal, Sandeepen
dc.contributor.authorSindel, Brian Marken
dc.contributor.authorJessop, Robin Stephenen
dc.date.accessioned2010-01-18T10:14:00Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.citationCommunications in Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences, 71(3a), p. 715-723en
dc.identifier.issn1379-1176en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/4174-
dc.description.abstractAn integrated weed management approach requires alternative management practices to herbicide use such as tillage, crop rotations and cultural controls to reduce soil weed seed banks. The objective of this study was to examine the value of different tillage practices and stubble burning to exhaust the seed bank of common weeds from the northern grain region of Australia. Five tillage and burning treatments were incorporated in a field experiment, at Armidale (30 degrees 30'S, 151 degrees 40'E), New South Wales, Australia in July 2004 in a randomized block design replicated four times. The trial was continued and treatments repeated in July 2005 with all the mature plants from the first year being allowed to shed seed in their respective treatment plots. The treatments were (i) no tillage (NT), (ii) chisel ploughing (CP), (iii) mould board ploughing (MBP), (iv) wheat straw burning with no tillage (SBNT) and (v) wheat straw burning with chisel ploughing (SBC). Soil samples were collected before applying treatments and before the weeds flowered to establish the seed bank status of the various weeds in the soil. Wheat was sown after the tillage treatments. Burning treatments were only initiated in the second year, one month prior to tillage treatments. The major weeds present in the seed bank before initiating the trial were Polygonum aviculare, Sonchus oleraceus and Avena fatua. Tillage promoted the germination of other weeds like Hibiscus trionum, Medicago sativa, Vicia sp. and Phalaris paradoxa later in the season in 2004 and Convolvulus erubescens emerged as a new weed in 2005. The MBP treatment in 2004 reduced the weed biomass to a significantly lower level of 55 g/m2 than the other treatments of CP (118 g/m2) and NT plots (196 g/m2) (P < 0.05). However, in 2005 SBC and MBP treatments were similar in reducing the weed biomass. In 2004, the grain yield trend of wheat was significantly different between CP and NT, and MBP and NT (P < 0.05) with maximum yield of 5898 kg/ha in CP and 5731 kg/ha in MBP. Rainfall before the start of the second trial season promoted the germination of a large numbers of weeds. SBC and MBP treatments reduced the numbers of most of the individual weed species compared with CP, SBNT and NT. SBC was able to destroy a large proportion of seeds most likely through burning and burying some in the soil and was found to be the best treatment in exhausting the seed bank followed closely by MBP which probably buried large number of seeds deep in the soil and promoted others to germinate. CP might have buried some of the seeds in the top 5-10 cm but also promoted parts of the seed bank to germinate. SBNT and NT provided an ideal medium for weeds to germinate and resulted in heavy infestations of weeds.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherGhent Universityen
dc.relation.ispartofCommunications in Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciencesen
dc.titleTillage and residue burning effects weed populations and seed banksen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.subject.keywordsCrop and Pasture Protection (Pests, Diseases and Weeds)en
local.contributor.firstnameSandeepen
local.contributor.firstnameBrian Marken
local.contributor.firstnameRobin Stephenen
local.subject.for2008070308 Crop and Pasture Protection (Pests, Diseases and Weeds)en
local.subject.seo2008820503 Grain Legumesen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailsnarwal2@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailbsindel@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailrjessop@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordpes:4782en
local.publisher.placeBelgiumen
local.format.startpage715en
local.format.endpage723en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume71en
local.identifier.issue3aen
local.contributor.lastnameNarwalen
local.contributor.lastnameSindelen
local.contributor.lastnameJessopen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:snarwal2en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:bsindelen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:rjessopen
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-4100-218Xen
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:4274en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleTillage and residue burning effects weed populations and seed banksen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17390813en
local.search.authorNarwal, Sandeepen
local.search.authorSindel, Brian Marken
local.search.authorJessop, Robin Stephenen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2006en
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1,282
checked on Feb 16, 2025
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.