Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/3904
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTattersall, Martinen
dc.contributor.authorButow, Phyllisen
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Judith Elizabethen
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Johnen
dc.date.accessioned2009-12-17T16:13:00Z-
dc.date.issued2002-
dc.identifier.citationMedical Journal of Australia, 177(9), p. 516-520en
dc.identifier.issn1326-5377en
dc.identifier.issn0025-729Xen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/3904-
dc.description.abstract• Information contained in letters of referral and reply often does not meet the information needs of letter recipients. • Missing reports of previous investigations and insufficient detail in the referral letter to specialists are the most serious and common problems. • General practitioners prefer structured, computer generated letters to unstructured, dictated letters. • Referring surgeons and GPs identify delay in receiving the reply letter and insufficient detail as relatively common problems after a new patient consultation. They want the reply letter to describe the proposed treatment, expected outcomes and any psychosocial concerns, yet these items are often omitted. • A letter content and format prompt card has the potential to enhance the quality of correspondence between medical specialists and referring doctors. • Specialist medical bodies should consider preparing prompt cards (setting out preferred information content and format for letters) to distribute to their members.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherAustralasian Medical Publishing Company Pty Ltden
dc.relation.ispartofMedical Journal of Australiaen
dc.titleImproving doctors lettersen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.subject.keywordsSociologyen
local.contributor.firstnameMartinen
local.contributor.firstnamePhyllisen
local.contributor.firstnameJudith Elizabethen
local.contributor.firstnameJohnen
local.subject.for2008160899 Sociology not elsewhere classifieden
local.subject.seo2008970116 Expanding Knowledge through Studies of Human Societyen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Behavioural, Cognitive and Social Sciencesen
local.profile.emailjbrown42@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordpes:5336en
local.publisher.placeAustraliaen
local.format.startpage516en
local.format.endpage520en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume177en
local.identifier.issue9en
local.contributor.lastnameTattersallen
local.contributor.lastnameButowen
local.contributor.lastnameBrownen
local.contributor.lastnameThompsonen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:jbrown42en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:3999en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleImproving doctors lettersen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.relation.urlhttps://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/177_09_041102/tat10851_fm.pdfen
local.search.authorTattersall, Martinen
local.search.authorButow, Phyllisen
local.search.authorBrown, Judith Elizabethen
local.search.authorThompson, Johnen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2002en
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1,118
checked on Apr 28, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.