Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/37952
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMorley, Louiseen
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-31T04:04:06Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-31T04:04:06Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationAustralian Social Work, 75(4), p. 458-470en
dc.identifier.issn1447-0748en
dc.identifier.issn0312-407Xen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/37952-
dc.description.abstract<p>Relationships are core to effective social work and provide the glue that binds diverse aspects of practice. Relational practice has come under threat in an era of managerialism, yet at the same time, it is undergoing a revitalisation in social work discourse. For practitioners on the ground, this can create something of a dilemma, because while their discipline steers them towards building relationships in their practice, their efforts are often unsupported by their organisations, which potentially adds to their workload. This paper presents Australian research that was designed to explore how social work practitioners in the child welfare field experienced the emotional labour involved in building and maintaining relationships in organisational environments characterised by economic and technical rationalism. In-depth interviews were used to explore how participants managed their feelings and the findings revealed how they had to "dig deep" into personal and professional resources to connect and converse with clients and colleagues in a meaningful way. When considered through a gendered lens, this issue raises questions about the ethics of workload distribution for relational work in a profession that is predominantly female.</p> <b>IMPLICATIONS</b><ul><li> The process of building relationships can be undermined by organisational environments that are heavily influenced by managerial principles and this can potentially threaten the ethos of relational practice.</li><li>Practitioners need to sustain critical reflection on the value of relationships in order to maintain focus on them.</li><li>Considering this issue through a gendered lens raises questions about the ethics of care afforded to practitioners.</li></ul>en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherRoutledgeen
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian Social Worken
dc.titleContemporary Practitioner Experiences of Relational Social Work: The Case of Child Welfareen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/0312407X.2021.2001831en
local.contributor.firstnameLouiseen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Healthen
local.profile.emaillmorley4@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeAustraliaen
local.format.startpage458en
local.format.endpage470en
local.identifier.scopusid85121102529en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume75en
local.identifier.issue4en
local.title.subtitleThe Case of Child Welfareen
local.contributor.lastnameMorleyen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:lmorley4en
local.profile.orcid0000-0003-2885-6698en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/37952en
local.date.onlineversion2021-12-05-
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleContemporary Practitioner Experiences of Relational Social Worken
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorMorley, Louiseen
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.identifier.wosid000726476000001en
local.year.available2021en
local.year.published2022en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/240ef358-4209-4ac5-9a35-a9cfd0b34057en
local.subject.for2020440901 Clinical social work practiceen
local.subject.for2020440902 Counselling, wellbeing and community servicesen
local.subject.for2020440599 Gender studies not elsewhere classifieden
local.subject.seo2020230113 Structure, delivery and resourcingen
local.subject.seo2020230199 Community services not elsewhere classifieden
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Health
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
checked on Jan 25, 2025

Page view(s)

1,460
checked on Aug 3, 2024

Download(s)

6
checked on Aug 3, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.