Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/3626
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorO'Neill, Alanen
dc.contributor.authorJabri, Muayyaden
dc.date.accessioned2009-12-04T10:39:00Z-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.citationLeadership & Organization Development Journal, 28(6), p. 571-588en
dc.identifier.issn1472-5347en
dc.identifier.issn0143-7739en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/3626-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This paper aims to show that the knowledge that many change efforts fail to deliver meaningful results is by no means new, but understanding why this is the case remains an important issue for those involved in the management of change. In this paper, the authors question the current emphasis of popularly held explanations of implementation failure by proposing an alternative perspective that draws on social constructionist theory. The authors argue that failure to recognize the legitimizing role and function of conversation has a significant contribution to implementation failure. Design/methodology/approach: This paper draws upon observations and information collected as part of a two-year longitudinal study conducted in an organization and two of its sales offices operating in the Asia Pacific Rim to support and illustrate the conceptual development of the theory presented. Findings: Change efforts will be negatively affected when new perceptions are not assimilated into the daily language and conversational practices used in the various groups and sub-groups that make up an organization. The authors present a model to demonstrate how various types of conversation within an organizational setting legitimize perceptions of reality, and how business leaders and change agents can work with this model in order to improve the likelihood of a successful implementation. Research limitations/implications: Guided by the work of Berger and Luckmann, the authors demonstrate how four levels of legitimization, upon which social constructions of reality proceed, have a significant contribution to play in determining the outcome of a change initiative. Originality/value: This paper provides a framework that will assist business leaders and change agents to assess how their organization's conversational legitimization processes may work for or against a proposed change, and what conversational practices will need to be altered to positively influence the outcome.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherEmerald Publishing Limiteden
dc.relation.ispartofLeadership & Organization Development Journalen
dc.titleLegitimation and group conversational practices: implications for managing changeen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/01437730710780994en
dc.subject.keywordsOrganisational Planning and Managementen
local.contributor.firstnameAlanen
local.contributor.firstnameMuayyaden
local.subject.for2008150312 Organisational Planning and Managementen
local.subject.seo2008910402 Managementen
local.profile.schoolUNE Business Schoolen
local.profile.emailmjabri@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordpes:5774en
local.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen
local.format.startpage571en
local.format.endpage588en
local.identifier.scopusid34548748695en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume28en
local.identifier.issue6en
local.title.subtitleimplications for managing changeen
local.contributor.lastnameO'Neillen
local.contributor.lastnameJabrien
dc.identifier.staffune-id:mjabrien
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:3716en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleLegitimation and group conversational practicesen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorO'Neill, Alanen
local.search.authorJabri, Muayyaden
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2007en
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

8
checked on Jul 6, 2024

Page view(s)

1,232
checked on Nov 12, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.