Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/28726
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Jessicaen
dc.contributor.authorFaux, Steven Gen
dc.contributor.authorGardner, Taniaen
dc.contributor.authorHobbs, Megan Jen
dc.contributor.authorJames, Matthew Aen
dc.contributor.authorJoubert, Amy Een
dc.contributor.authorKladnitski, Natalieen
dc.contributor.authorNewby, Jill Men
dc.contributor.authorSchultz, Reginaen
dc.contributor.authorShiner, Christine Ten
dc.contributor.authorAndrews, Gavinen
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-19T04:13:39Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-19T04:13:39Z-
dc.date.issued2019-12-
dc.identifier.citationPain Medicine, 20(12), p. 2385-2396en
dc.identifier.issn1526-4637en
dc.identifier.issn1526-2375en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/28726-
dc.description.abstractObjective: Chronic pain is a prevalent and burdensome condition. Reboot Online was developed to address treatment barriers traditionally associated with accessing face-to-face chronic pain management programs. It is a comprehensive multidisciplinary online treatment program, based on an existing and effective face-to-face multidisciplinary pain program (the Reboot program). Design & Participants: A CONSORT-compliant randomized controlled trial was conducted, enrolling adults who had experienced pain for three months or longer. Methods: Participants were randomly allocated to either an eight-lesson multidisciplinary pain management program, Reboot Online (N=41), or to a usual care (UC) control group (N=39). Clinical oversight was provided by a multidisciplinary team remotely, including physiotherapists and clinical psychologists. Participants were measured at baseline, post-treatment (week 16), and three-month follow-up (week 28). Results: Intention-to-treat analyses revealed that Reboot Online was significantly more effective than UC at increasing pain self-efficacy (g=0.69) at post-treatment, and these gains were maintained at follow-up. Similarly, Reboot Online was significantly more effective than UC on several secondary measures at post-treatment and follow-up, including movement-based fear avoidance and pain-related disability, but it did not significantly reduce pain interference or depression compared with UC. Clinician input was minimal, and adherence to Reboot Online was moderate, with 61% of participants (N=25) completing all eight lessons. Conclusions: Reboot Online presents a novel approach to multidisciplinary pain management and offers an accessible, efficacious alternative and viable treatment option for chronic pain management.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofPain Medicineen
dc.titleReboot Online: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing an Online Multidisciplinary Pain Management Program with Usual Care for Chronic Painen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/pm/pnz208en
dcterms.accessRightsGolden
local.contributor.firstnameJessicaen
local.contributor.firstnameSteven Gen
local.contributor.firstnameTaniaen
local.contributor.firstnameMegan Jen
local.contributor.firstnameMatthew Aen
local.contributor.firstnameAmy Een
local.contributor.firstnameNatalieen
local.contributor.firstnameJill Men
local.contributor.firstnameReginaen
local.contributor.firstnameChristine Ten
local.contributor.firstnameGavinen
local.relation.isfundedbyNHMRCen
local.subject.for2008110319 Psychiatry (incl. Psychotherapy)en
local.subject.for2008111714 Mental Healthen
local.subject.for2008170106 Health, Clinical and Counselling Psychologyen
local.subject.seo2008920410 Mental Healthen
local.subject.seo2008920209 Mental Health Servicesen
local.subject.seo2008920204 Evaluation of Health Outcomesen
local.profile.schoolNew England Institute of Healthcare Research, Faculty of Medicine and Healthen
local.profile.emailmegan.hobbs@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.grant.number1037787en
local.grant.number1145382en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeUnited States of Americaen
local.format.startpage2385en
local.format.endpage2396en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume20en
local.identifier.issue12en
local.title.subtitleA Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing an Online Multidisciplinary Pain Management Program with Usual Care for Chronic Painen
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameSmithen
local.contributor.lastnameFauxen
local.contributor.lastnameGardneren
local.contributor.lastnameHobbsen
local.contributor.lastnameJamesen
local.contributor.lastnameJouberten
local.contributor.lastnameKladnitskien
local.contributor.lastnameNewbyen
local.contributor.lastnameSchultzen
local.contributor.lastnameShineren
local.contributor.lastnameAndrewsen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:mhobbs8en
local.profile.orcid0000-0003-0131-0089en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/28726en
local.date.onlineversion2019-09-09-
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleReboot Onlineen
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteSt Vincent’s Clinic Foundation (Sydney, Australia); the Motor Accidents Authority, NSW Government (now the State Insurance Regulatory Authority [SIRA]); Medical Research Future Foundation (MRFF)en
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.relation.grantdescriptionNHMRC/1037787en
local.relation.grantdescriptionNHMRC/1145382en
local.search.authorSmith, Jessicaen
local.search.authorFaux, Steven Gen
local.search.authorGardner, Taniaen
local.search.authorHobbs, Megan Jen
local.search.authorJames, Matthew Aen
local.search.authorJoubert, Amy Een
local.search.authorKladnitski, Natalieen
local.search.authorNewby, Jill Men
local.search.authorSchultz, Reginaen
local.search.authorShiner, Christine Ten
local.search.authorAndrews, Gavinen
local.istranslatedNoen
local.uneassociationNoen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.year.available2019en
local.year.published2019en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/5cd6660e-db08-4760-9fbe-ca2ff9bc5862en
local.subject.for2020520302 Clinical psychologyen
local.subject.seo2020200409 Mental healthen
local.subject.seo2020200305 Mental health servicesen
local.subject.seo2020200202 Evaluation of health outcomesen
dc.notification.token384b1886-f6a1-4798-aeda-2a3dddb5029fen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

25
checked on Apr 27, 2024

Page view(s)

970
checked on May 12, 2024

Download(s)

4
checked on May 12, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.