Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/2503
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRogers, Lesleyen
dc.contributor.authorKaplan, Giselaen
local.source.editorEditor(s): Cass R Sunstein and Martha C Nussbaumen
dc.date.accessioned2009-10-14T15:14:00Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.citationAnimal Rights: Current Debates and New Direction, p. 175-202en
dc.identifier.isbn0195152174en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/2503-
dc.description.abstractAny current legislation or code of practice for animal welfare must take into account current scientific knowledge on the biology and behavior of different species. We have guidelines for rodents, dogs, cats, apes, and any number of animals to ensure that research and other practices meet the needs of specific orders, families, or even species. The call for animal rights, it seems, functions on a different intellectual trajectory, namely, the notion of "sameness" and perhaps even of "universality" - as indeed do human rights. At least, in human rights, the conferment of rights on a global scale is for one species, although cultural differences and different legal traditions may also decisively impinge on ideas of universality. How much more difficult is it to decide rights for animals! One of the hallmarks of animal existence is its diversity and difference, the specificity of their requirements, skills, and needs in very concrete ecological settings. If we attempt to find as a measuring stick a common denominator, we inevitably encounter the problem of deciding which species will be included in, and which excluded from, the new legislative practices. In other words, where does one draw the line between those to be given the privilege of protection from abuse and those to be not so treated? As we will show, this important decision cannot be made lightly, and the deeper we look at it, the more we realize that drawing the line accurately is bedeviled by gaps in the relevant scientific knowledge about most species and the inaccuracies of attempting to rate species according to a single criterion, or even a small set of criteria. It has been proposed that animal rights should be awarded according to a set of criteria related to higher cognition. The greater an animal's sense of self-awareness and the more advanced its higher cognition, the better the case to include its species as the recipient of a set of new privileges.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofAnimal Rights: Current Debates and New Directionen
dc.relation.isversionof1en
dc.titleAll Animals Are Not Equal: The Interface between Scientific Knowledge and Legislation for Animal Rightsen
dc.typeBook Chapteren
dc.subject.keywordsHistory and Philosophy of Science (incl Non-historical Philosophy of Science)en
local.contributor.firstnameLesleyen
local.contributor.firstnameGiselaen
local.subject.for2008220206 History and Philosophy of Science (incl Non-historical Philosophy of Science)en
local.subject.seo2008970106 Expanding Knowledge in the Biological Sciencesen
local.identifier.epublicationsvtls086319320en
local.profile.schoolSchool of Science and Technologyen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Science and Technologyen
local.profile.emaillrogers@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailgkaplan@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryB1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordpes:1457en
local.publisher.placeNew York, United States of Americaen
local.identifier.totalchapters14en
local.format.startpage175en
local.format.endpage202en
local.title.subtitleThe Interface between Scientific Knowledge and Legislation for Animal Rightsen
local.contributor.lastnameRogersen
local.contributor.lastnameKaplanen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:lrogersen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:gkaplanen
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:2576en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleAll Animals Are Not Equalen
local.output.categorydescriptionB1 Chapter in a Scholarly Booken
local.relation.urlhttp://books.google.com.au/books?id=e7FME0btkH0C&lpg=PP1&pg=PA175en
local.relation.urlhttp://www.oup.com.au/titles/academic/law/legal_studiespolitics/9780195305104en
local.relation.urlhttp://nla.gov.au/anbd.bib-an24722882en
local.search.authorRogers, Lesleyen
local.search.authorKaplan, Giselaen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2004en
Appears in Collections:Book Chapter
School of Science and Technology
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1,862
checked on Jun 11, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.