1. Research UNE
  2. UNE
  3. Conference Publication
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/2289
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDavidson, Iainen
local.source.editorEditor(s): Ivan Brizen
dc.date.accessioned2009-08-20T15:22:00Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.citationEtnoarqueología De La Prehistoria: Más allá de la Analogía, p. 257-271en
dc.identifier.isbn840008456Xen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/2289-
dc.description.tableofcontentshttp://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=12386en
dc.languageesen
dc.publisherImpreso en Espanaen
dc.relation.ispartofEtnoarqueología De La Prehistoria: Más allá de la Analogíaen
dc.titleArqueología etnohistóricaen
dc.typeConference Publicationen
dc.relation.conferenceSimposio Internacional Etnoarqueología de la Prehistoriaen
dc.subject.keywordsSocial and Cultural Anthropologyen
local.contributor.firstnameIainen
local.subject.for2008160104 Social and Cultural Anthropologyen
local.subject.seo750902 Understanding the pasts of other societiesen
local.profile.schoolAdministrationen
local.profile.emailidavidso@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryE1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordpes:4730en
local.date.conference1st - 3rd September, 2004en
local.conference.placeBarcelona, Spainen
local.publisher.placeMadrid, Spainen
local.format.startpage257en
local.format.endpage271en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.contributor.lastnameDavidsonen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:idavidsoen
local.profile.orcid0000-0003-1840-9704en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:2362en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.abstract.englishIn this paper I explore the contrast between the approaches of Binford and Hodder to the use of ethnoarchaeology as a mean of interpreting the evidence of past behaviour. Using a semiotic approach. I identify that Binford was concerned with the discoveryof signs of behaviour which would serve as indices for the interpretation of archaeological evidence, Hodder. on the other hand, became preoccupied with the pervasiveness of symbols in the lives of his informants in Africa. Recognising that symbols are related to their referents both arbitrarily and through the cultural conventions of their creators. I argue that it is impossible to obtain indices of the significance of symbols such that we caninterpret those from the past. Using examples from my own work in Spain and in Australia, I show that it is. nevertheless possible to create historical accounts of the past. but that they will not necessarily be like historical accounts based on written texts.en
local.title.maintitleArqueología etnohistóricaen
local.output.categorydescriptionE1 Refereed Scholarly Conference Publicationen
local.conference.detailsSimposio Internacional Etnoarqueología de la Prehistoria, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 1st - 3rd September, 2004en
local.search.authorDavidson, Iainen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2006-
local.date.start2004-09-01-
local.date.end2004-09-03-
Appears in Collections:Conference Publication
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.