Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/22228
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTierney, D Aen
dc.contributor.authorSommerville, K Den
dc.contributor.authorTierney, K Een
dc.contributor.authorFatemi, Men
dc.contributor.authorGross, Caroline Len
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-11T16:27:00Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationBiodiversity and Conservation, 26(9), p. 2115-2131en
dc.identifier.issn1572-9710en
dc.identifier.issn0960-3115en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/22228-
dc.description.abstractBiodiversity offsetting promotes the protection or restoration of biodiversity at one site to compensate for the loss of biodiversity due to development at another site. Thus populations of species at a development site may be extirpated in the belief that offsetting elsewhere will compensate for the loss of biodiversity. In this study we tested the replaceability of roadside populations of the orchid Diuris platichila threatened by development (populations 1-5, n = 50-541 plants) with a potential offset population occurring in nearby natural vegetation (population 6, n = 143 plants). We measured differences in habitat among the populations and associated differences in flowering and fruiting. We also measured genotypic diversity within and among the populations, and the capacity of soil from each population to promote the symbiotic germination of outcrossed seed from the two largest populations (populations 1-2). An evaluation of the performance of the relevant offset policy was also undertaken which was informed by these studies. Compared to the roadside populations, the potential offset site had limited flowering (except after fire) and was genotypically less diverse. Soil from the potential offset site, and populations 2, 3 and 5, supported significantly less seed germination than soil from population 1. Translocating individuals from the most genotypically diverse populations into the offset population could help to buffer against the loss of genetic diversity if offsetting was required; however, the limited reproduction and recruitment opportunities at the offset site could result in the eventual erosion of any initial increase in diversity. The offset policy failed to secure a suitable offset for a hypothesized loss of plants. More generally we conclude that offsetting approaches which do not assess genotypic diversity and recruitment capacity may fail in their objective of protecting species and that maintaining populations in safe sites may be required.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSpringer Netherlandsen
dc.relation.ispartofBiodiversity and Conservationen
dc.titleTrading populations: can biodiversity offsets effectively compensate for population losses?en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10531-017-1348-2en
dc.subject.keywordsEnvironmental Impact Assessmenten
dc.subject.keywordsConservation and Biodiversityen
dc.subject.keywordsEnvironmental Managementen
local.contributor.firstnameD Aen
local.contributor.firstnameK Den
local.contributor.firstnameK Een
local.contributor.firstnameMen
local.contributor.firstnameCaroline Len
local.subject.for2008050204 Environmental Impact Assessmenten
local.subject.for2008050202 Conservation and Biodiversityen
local.subject.for2008050205 Environmental Managementen
local.subject.seo2008960805 Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity at Regional or Larger Scalesen
local.profile.schoolOffice of Faculty of Science, Ag, Business and Lawen
local.profile.emailcgross@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-chute-20170711-180459en
local.publisher.placeNetherlandsen
local.format.startpage2115en
local.format.endpage2131en
local.identifier.scopusid85017175949en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume26en
local.identifier.issue9en
local.title.subtitlecan biodiversity offsets effectively compensate for population losses?en
local.contributor.lastnameTierneyen
local.contributor.lastnameSommervilleen
local.contributor.lastnameTierneyen
local.contributor.lastnameFatemien
local.contributor.lastnameGrossen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:cgrossen
local.profile.orcid0000-0001-8014-1548en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:22418en
local.identifier.handlehttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/22228en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleTrading populationsen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorTierney, D Aen
local.search.authorSommerville, K Den
local.search.authorTierney, K Een
local.search.authorFatemi, Men
local.search.authorGross, Caroline Len
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.identifier.wosid000405799700007en
local.year.published2017en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/49f9b721-a90b-4e4a-93f5-3b0d73d19d7fen
local.subject.for2020410402 Environmental assessment and monitoringen
local.subject.for2020410401 Conservation and biodiversityen
local.subject.for2020410404 Environmental managementen
local.subject.seo2020180203 Coastal or estuarine biodiversityen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
checked on Nov 2, 2024

Page view(s)

1,638
checked on Aug 3, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.