Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/21139
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPressey, R Len
dc.contributor.authorWhish, G Len
dc.contributor.authorBarrett, Thomasen
dc.contributor.authorWatts, Matthewen
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-30T12:20:00Z-
dc.date.issued2002-
dc.identifier.citationBiological Conservation, 106(1), p. 57-69en
dc.identifier.issn1873-2917en
dc.identifier.issn0006-3207en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/21139-
dc.description.abstractWe applied six measures of effectiveness to recent decisions about additional conservation areas in north-eastern New South Wales. Three have been widely used previously: (1) number of conservation areas; (2) total extent of conservation areas; and (3) representativeness (the proportion of natural features such as forest types or animal species represented in conservation areas to some targeted level). The other measures were: (4) efficiency or representation bias (the extent to which some features are protected above target levels at the expense of others that remain poorly protected); (5) relative protection of vulnerable areas within public land (percentage protection of flat, fertile areas relative to that of steep and/or infertile areas); and (6) relative protection of vulnerable areas across all tenures (the correlation between the amount of protection given to features and their vulnerabilities to clearing). We applied the measures in two chronological comparisons: the reserve system in 1994, 1996 and 1997; and before and after the Interim Assessment Process of 1996 which involved negotiations over new reserves and extensive unreserved areas that were temporarily deferred from logging. Over the study period, despite expansion of formal conservation and progress towards quantitative conservation targets, gazetted reserves remained strongly biased to the steep and/or infertile parts of public lands. Both gazetted reserves and areas deferred from logging increased the bias in protection away from forest types most vulnerable to clearing and for which regional conservation targets had already been most compromised. Two major challenges for future conservation decisions in the region are common to conservation planning generally: (1) to focus protection within public tenure on habitats and species most vulnerable to threatening processes such as logging; and (2) to provide more effective conservation management on private lands where loss of native vegetation continues.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherElsevier BVen
dc.relation.ispartofBiological Conservationen
dc.titleEffectiveness of protected areas in north-eastern New South Wales: recent trends in six measuresen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00229-4en
dc.subject.keywordsEnvironmental Science and Managementen
dc.subject.keywordsDecision Support and Group Support Systemsen
local.contributor.firstnameR Len
local.contributor.firstnameG Len
local.contributor.firstnameThomasen
local.contributor.firstnameMatthewen
local.subject.for2008080605 Decision Support and Group Support Systemsen
local.subject.for2008050299 Environmental Science and Management not elsewhere classifieden
local.subject.seo2008960599 Ecosystem Assessment and Management not elsewhere classifieden
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolIT - Information Servicesen
local.profile.emailtbarret5@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailmwatts24@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-chute-20170327-102459en
local.publisher.placeNetherlandsen
local.format.startpage57en
local.format.endpage69en
local.identifier.scopusid0036256076en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume106en
local.identifier.issue1en
local.title.subtitlerecent trends in six measuresen
local.contributor.lastnamePresseyen
local.contributor.lastnameWhishen
local.contributor.lastnameBarretten
local.contributor.lastnameWattsen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:tbarret5en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:mwatts24en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-9094-1335en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:21332en
local.identifier.handlehttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/21139en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleEffectiveness of protected areas in north-eastern New South Walesen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorPressey, R Len
local.search.authorWhish, G Len
local.search.authorBarrett, Thomasen
local.search.authorWatts, Matthewen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2002en
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

129
checked on Mar 9, 2024

Page view(s)

990
checked on Mar 8, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.