Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/21087
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRichard, Lauralieen
dc.contributor.authorPiper, Donellaen
dc.contributor.authorWeavell, Wayneen
dc.contributor.authorCallander, Rosemaryen
dc.contributor.authorIedema, Ricken
dc.contributor.authorFurler, Johnen
dc.contributor.authorPierce, Daviden
dc.contributor.authorGodbee, Kalien
dc.contributor.authorGunn, Janeen
dc.contributor.authorPalmer, Victoria Jen
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-25T10:08:00Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationTrials, v.18, p. 1-11en
dc.identifier.issn1745-6215en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/21087-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Engagement is essential in trials research but is rarely embedded across all stages of the research continuum. The development, use, effectiveness and value of engagement in trials research is poorly researched and understood, and models of engagement are rarely informed by theory. This article describes an innovative methodological approach for the development and application of a relational model of engagement in a stepped wedge designed cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT), the CORE study. The purpose of the model is to embed engagement across the continuum of the trial which will test if an experience-based co-design intervention improves psychosocial recovery for people affected by severe mental illness. Methods: The model was developed in three stages and used a structured iterative approach. A context mapping assessment of trial sites was followed by a literature review on recruitment and retention of hardto-reach groups in complex interventions and RCTs. Relevant theoretical and philosophical underpinnings were identified by an additional review of literature to inform model development and enactment of engagement activities. Results: Policy, organisational and service user data combined with evidence from the literature on barriers to recruitment provided contextual information. Four perspectives support the theoretical framework of the relational model of engagement and this is organised around two facets: the relational and continuous. The relational facet is underpinned by relational ethical theories and participatory action research principles. The continuous facet is supported by systems thinking and translation theories. These combine to enact an ethics of engagement and evoke knowledge mobilisation to reach the higher order goals of the model. Conclusions: Engagement models are invaluable for trials research, but there are opportunities to advance their theoretical development and application, particularly within stepped wedge designed studies where there may be a significant waiting period between enrolment in a study and receipt of an intervention.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltden
dc.relation.ispartofTrialsen
dc.titleAdvancing engagement methods for trials: the CORE study relational model of engagement for a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial of experience-based co-design for people living with severe mental illnessesen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13063-017-1878-7en
dcterms.accessRightsGolden
dc.subject.keywordsHealth Policyen
local.contributor.firstnameLauralieen
local.contributor.firstnameDonellaen
local.contributor.firstnameWayneen
local.contributor.firstnameRosemaryen
local.contributor.firstnameRicken
local.contributor.firstnameJohnen
local.contributor.firstnameDaviden
local.contributor.firstnameKalien
local.contributor.firstnameJaneen
local.contributor.firstnameVictoria Jen
local.subject.for2008160508 Health Policyen
local.subject.seo2008920599 Specific Population Health (excl. Indigenous Health) not elsewhere classifieden
local.profile.schoolUNE Business Schoolen
local.profile.emaildpiper@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20170310-13482en
local.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen
local.identifier.runningnumber169en
local.format.startpage1en
local.format.endpage11en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume18en
local.title.subtitlethe CORE study relational model of engagement for a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial of experience-based co-design for people living with severe mental illnessesen
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameRicharden
local.contributor.lastnamePiperen
local.contributor.lastnameWeavellen
local.contributor.lastnameCallanderen
local.contributor.lastnameIedemaen
local.contributor.lastnameFurleren
local.contributor.lastnamePierceen
local.contributor.lastnameGodbeeen
local.contributor.lastnameGunnen
local.contributor.lastnamePalmeren
dc.identifier.staffune-id:dpiperen
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-5802-6380en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:21280en
local.identifier.handlehttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/21087en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleAdvancing engagement methods for trialsen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorRichard, Lauralieen
local.search.authorPiper, Donellaen
local.search.authorWeavell, Wayneen
local.search.authorCallander, Rosemaryen
local.search.authorIedema, Ricken
local.search.authorFurler, Johnen
local.search.authorPierce, Daviden
local.search.authorGodbee, Kalien
local.search.authorGunn, Janeen
local.search.authorPalmer, Victoria Jen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.identifier.wosid000415626900001en
local.year.published2017en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/71055a01-87fd-461e-a795-aae7ea8e2ce3en
local.subject.for2020440706 Health policyen
local.subject.seo2020200505 Migrant healthen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

18
checked on Aug 3, 2024

Page view(s)

1,220
checked on Aug 11, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.