Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/20539
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorClancey, Garneren
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-23T16:38:00Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 17(1), p. 55-67en
dc.identifier.issn1572-9869en
dc.identifier.issn0928-1371en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/20539-
dc.description.abstractCrime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) guidelines have been adopted in numerous jurisdictions around the world. In 2001, guidelines were introduced in New South Wales (Australia) to ensure that proposed developments/redevelopments of the built environment reflected key CPTED principles. The guidelines state that in certain circumstances a crime risk assessment is required for the proposed development and the resulting report forms part of the development application, which is reviewed by the relevant consent authority (a council or state government department depending upon the size of the development). To date, these guidelines have not been evaluated, making it impossible to assess their impact and the utility of the associated crime risk assessment reports. Moreover, much of the academic literature on CPTED has historically tended to focus on the implementation of CPTED strategies and not on the processes adopted pre-development. To partially fill this gap in knowledge, a small number (4) of publicly available crime risk assessment reports have been reviewed here and key issues highlighted. In particular, the relevance of some aspects of these reports is questioned, as is the impact of the relationship between the client (i.e. developer) commissioning the report and the findings of the 'independent' consultant. The small sample of risk assessment reports randomly selected for review cannot be considered representative of the larger body of such reports. Nonetheless, the insights generated from this exercise should be of interest to policy makers and practitioners engaged in this work.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSpringer Netherlandsen
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal on Criminal Policy and Researchen
dc.titleCrime Risk Assessments in New South Walesen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10610-010-9134-7en
dc.subject.keywordsCauses and Prevention of Crimeen
local.contributor.firstnameGarneren
local.subject.for2008160201 Causes and Prevention of Crimeen
local.subject.seo2008940402 Crime Preventionen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Behavioural, Cognitive and Social Sciencesen
local.profile.emailcgarner@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20170324-101012en
local.publisher.placeNetherlandsen
local.format.startpage55en
local.format.endpage67en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume17en
local.identifier.issue1en
local.contributor.lastnameClanceyen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:cgarneren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:20734en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleCrime Risk Assessments in New South Walesen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorClancey, Garneren
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2011en
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Files in This Item:
3 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

9
checked on Jun 15, 2024

Page view(s)

1,078
checked on Jun 16, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.