Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/20152
Title: | The construct validity of the h-index | Contributor(s): | Barnes, Cameron (author) | Publication Date: | 2016 | Open Access: | Yes | DOI: | 10.1108/jd-10-2015-0127 | Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/20152 | Abstract: | Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to show how bibliometrics would benefit from a stronger programme of construct validity. Design/methodology/approach - The value of the construct validity concept is demonstrated by applying this approach to the evaluation of the h-index, a widely used metric. Findings - The paper demonstrates that the h-index comprehensively fails any test of construct validity. In simple terms, the metric does not measure what it purports to measure. This conclusion suggests that the current popularity of the h-index as a topic for bibliometric research represents wasted effort, which might have been avoided if researchers had adopted the approach suggested in this paper. Research limitations/implications - This study is based on the analysis of a single bibliometric concept. Practical implications - The conclusion that the h-index fails any test in terms of construct validity implies that the widespread use of this metric within the higher education sector as a management tool represents poor practice, and almost certainly results in the misallocation of resources. Social implications - This paper suggests that the current enthusiasm for the h-index within the higher education sector is misplaced. The implication is that universities, grant funding bodies and faculty administrators should abandon the use of the h-index as a management tool. Such a change would have a significant effect on current hiring, promotion and tenure practices within the sector, as well as current attitudes towards the measurement of academic performance. Originality/value - The originality of the paper lies in the systematic application of the concept of construct validity to bibliometric enquiry. | Publication Type: | Journal Article | Source of Publication: | Journal of Documentation, 72(5), p. 878-895 | Publisher: | Emerald Publishing Limited | Place of Publication: | United Kingdom | ISSN: | 1758-7379 0022-0418 |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: | 080799 Library and Information Studies not elsewhere classified | Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: | 461005 Informetrics | Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: | 890302 Library and Archival Services | Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: | 220303 Library and archival services | Peer Reviewed: | Yes | HERDC Category Description: | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal |
---|---|
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
open/SOURCE02.pdf | Pre-peer review version | 616.66 kB | Adobe PDF Download Adobe | View/Open |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
6
checked on Mar 9, 2024
Page view(s)
1,210
checked on Feb 25, 2024
Download(s)
472
checked on Feb 25, 2024
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.