Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/19691
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Hunter, John T | en |
dc.contributor.author | Lechner, Alex M | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-12-08T10:29:00Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Ecological Management & Restoration, 17(2), p. 128-132 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1442-8903 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1442-7001 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/19691 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Roff et al. (Ecological Management and Restoration, 17, 2016, 000) provide a discussion of the criteria expected for the best approach to validation of mapping programs and uses Hunter (Ecological Management & Restoration 17, 2016, 40) to highlight issues involved. While we support the general principles outlined, we note that the review does not apply the same standards to Sivertsen et al. (Greater Hunter Native Vegetation Mapping Geodatabase Guide (Version 4.0). Office of Environment and Heritage, Department of the Premier and Cabinet, Sydney, Australia, 2011), the original document critiqued by Hunter (Ecological Management & Restoration 17, 2016, 40). The Hunter (Ecological Management & Restoration 17, 2016, 40) validation was based on a larger sample size, greater sampling within mapping units and greater representation of landscapes than Sivertsen et al. (Greater Hunter Native Vegetation Mapping Geodatabase Guide (Version 4.0). Office of Environment and Heritage, Department of the Premier and Cabinet, Sydney, Australia, 2011). Survey and validation sites being placed along public roads and lands are common to both the general Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) and Hunter (Ecological Management & Restoration 17, 2016, 40) validation methodologies. Thus, the criticisms of Roff et al. (Ecological Management and Restoration, 17, 2016, 000) of the Hunter (Ecological Management & Restoration 17, 2016, 40) approach apply equally, if not more, to Sivertsen et al. (Greater Hunter Native Vegetation Mapping Geodatabase Guide (Version 4.0). Office of Environment and Heritage, Department of the Premier and Cabinet, Sydney, Australia, 2011). We outline in the article how the Roff et al. (Ecological Management and Restoration, 17, 2016, 000) critique was selective and in some cases incorrect in its analysis of issues presented in Hunter (Ecological Management & Restoration 17, 2016, 40) and did not apply the same criteria to their own work. We conclude by discussing future directions for validating and mapping vegetation communities. | en |
dc.language | en | en |
dc.publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia | en |
dc.relation.ispartof | Ecological Management & Restoration | en |
dc.title | Reliability of map accuracy assessments: A reply to Roff et al. (2016) | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/emr.12215 | en |
dc.subject.keywords | Natural Resource Management | en |
dc.subject.keywords | Landscape Ecology | en |
dc.subject.keywords | Conservation and Biodiversity | en |
local.contributor.firstname | John T | en |
local.contributor.firstname | Alex M | en |
local.subject.for2008 | 050209 Natural Resource Management | en |
local.subject.for2008 | 050202 Conservation and Biodiversity | en |
local.subject.for2008 | 050104 Landscape Ecology | en |
local.subject.seo2008 | 960501 Ecosystem Assessment and Management at Regional or Larger Scales | en |
local.subject.seo2008 | 960604 Environmental Management Systems | en |
local.subject.seo2008 | 960799 Environmental Policy, Legislation and Standards not elsewhere classified | en |
local.profile.school | School of Environmental and Rural Science | en |
local.profile.email | jhunte20@une.edu.au | en |
local.output.category | C1 | en |
local.record.place | au | en |
local.record.institution | University of New England | en |
local.identifier.epublicationsrecord | une-20161006-103920 | en |
local.publisher.place | Australia | en |
local.format.startpage | 128 | en |
local.format.endpage | 132 | en |
local.identifier.scopusid | 84971013865 | en |
local.peerreviewed | Yes | en |
local.identifier.volume | 17 | en |
local.identifier.issue | 2 | en |
local.title.subtitle | A reply to Roff et al. (2016) | en |
local.contributor.lastname | Hunter | en |
local.contributor.lastname | Lechner | en |
dc.identifier.staff | une-id:jhunte20 | en |
local.profile.orcid | 0000-0001-5112-0465 | en |
local.profile.role | author | en |
local.profile.role | author | en |
local.identifier.unepublicationid | une:19881 | en |
dc.identifier.academiclevel | Academic | en |
local.title.maintitle | Reliability of map accuracy assessments | en |
local.output.categorydescription | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal | en |
local.search.author | Hunter, John T | en |
local.search.author | Lechner, Alex M | en |
local.uneassociation | Unknown | en |
local.identifier.wosid | 000376680600007 | en |
local.year.published | 2016 | en |
local.fileurl.closedpublished | https://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/7e18760c-30b5-40f1-a258-04aea9b63ba4 | en |
local.subject.for2020 | 410406 Natural resource management | en |
local.subject.for2020 | 410401 Conservation and biodiversity | en |
local.subject.for2020 | 410206 Landscape ecology | en |
local.subject.seo2020 | 180403 Assessment and management of Antarctic and Southern Ocean ecosystems | en |
local.subject.seo2020 | 189999 Other environmental management not elsewhere classified | en |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format |
---|
SCOPUSTM
Citations
2
checked on Feb 22, 2025
Page view(s)
1,410
checked on Apr 21, 2024
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.