Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/17976
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDonleavy, Gabrielen
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-09T11:15:00Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Critical Accounting, 7(4), p. 315-334en
dc.identifier.issn1757-9856en
dc.identifier.issn1757-9848en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/17976-
dc.description.abstractThe opportunity to achieve a major turning point in accounting history was the publication of The Corporate in the UK in 1975. It recommended several new reports, but its recommendations were largely ignored. One of the recommended reports, however, the value added statement, has been adopted by a number of jurisdictions around the world with stakeholder accountability as a prime objective. This paper surveys the arguments for the value added statement being for the generality of statement users what the income statement and statement of financial position have for stockholders and bondholders alone. The actual use made of the statements around the world and their usefulness is then reviewed, and the reasons for a quite widespread disappointment are discussed. Finally, the paper relates the value added statement to the ruins of the labour theory of value and suggests future research to determine the contribution value added statements could make to determining the extent to which a corporation's results are the spoils of a zero sum game under oligopolistic conditions or value genuinely created for the industry or economy a whole.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherInderscience Publishersen
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Critical Accountingen
dc.titleUsefulness unfulfilled: a performance review of value added statementsen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1504/IJCA.2015.072002en
dc.subject.keywordsInternational Accountingen
dc.subject.keywordsFinancial Accountingen
dc.subject.keywordsAccounting Theory and Standardsen
local.contributor.firstnameGabrielen
local.subject.for2008150101 Accounting Theory and Standardsen
local.subject.for2008150103 Financial Accountingen
local.subject.for2008150104 International Accountingen
local.subject.seo2008919999 Economic Framework not elsewhere classifieden
local.subject.seo2008910299 Microeconomics not elsewhere classifieden
local.profile.schoolUNE Business Schoolen
local.profile.emailgdonlea2@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20150910-143125en
local.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen
local.format.startpage315en
local.format.endpage334en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume7en
local.identifier.issue4en
local.title.subtitlea performance review of value added statementsen
local.contributor.lastnameDonleavyen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:gdonlea2en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-9272-3315en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:18185en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleUsefulness unfulfilleden
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorDonleavy, Gabrielen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2015en
local.subject.for2020350101 Accounting theory and standardsen
local.subject.for2020350103 Financial accountingen
local.subject.for2020350104 International accountingen
local.subject.seo2020159999 Other economic framework not elsewhere classifieden
local.subject.seo2020150599 Microeconomics not elsewhere classifieden
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1,118
checked on Jul 23, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.