Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/1746
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Werren, Julia Catherine | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-05-25T12:11:00Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Law and Medicine, 15(2), p. 254-271 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1320-159X | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/1746 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This article analyses how bioethics and law interact and work together. The first half of the article provides definitions of both ethics and bioethics. The article then considers a number of different bioethical standpoints to demonstrate the variance of views in relation to bioethics. In addition, the first half of the article focuses on the different regulatory possibilities in regard tobioethical contexts. This demonstrates that law is of central importance to bioethics. This part also shows that even though law and ethics are often used simultaneously to achieve bioethical goals, law and ethics cannot be used interchangeably. Thus, even though it is somewhat inevitable that law will be used in the pursuit of the goals of bioethics, bioethics and bioethical principle should not be merely a vehicle for law-makers to utilise. The second half of the article focuses on the issues of autonomy and consent to demonstrate how law and ethics have developed in one of the foundation areas of bioethics. | en |
dc.language | en | en |
dc.publisher | Thomson Lawbook Co | en |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Law and Medicine | en |
dc.title | The bioethics and law paradox: An argument to maintain separateness with a hint of togetherness | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dcterms.accessRights | UNE Green | en |
dc.subject.keywords | Law | en |
local.contributor.firstname | Julia Catherine | en |
local.subject.for2008 | 180199 Law not elsewhere classified | en |
local.subject.seo | 750599 Justice and the law not elsewhere classified | en |
local.profile.school | School of Law | en |
local.profile.email | jwerren@une.edu.au | en |
local.output.category | C1 | en |
local.record.place | au | en |
local.record.institution | University of New England | en |
local.identifier.epublicationsrecord | pes:5244 | en |
local.publisher.place | Australia | en |
local.format.startpage | 254 | en |
local.format.endpage | 271 | en |
local.peerreviewed | Yes | en |
local.identifier.volume | 15 | en |
local.identifier.issue | 2 | en |
local.title.subtitle | An argument to maintain separateness with a hint of togetherness | en |
local.access.fulltext | Yes | en |
local.contributor.lastname | Werren | en |
dc.identifier.staff | une-id:jwerren | en |
local.profile.orcid | 0000-0001-6750-5212 | en |
local.profile.role | author | en |
local.identifier.unepublicationid | une:1806 | en |
dc.identifier.academiclevel | Academic | en |
local.title.maintitle | The bioethics and law paradox | en |
local.output.categorydescription | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal | en |
local.relation.url | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18035843 | en |
local.relation.url | http://www.thomsonreuters.com.au/catalogue/shopexd.asp?id=965 | en |
local.search.author | Werren, Julia Catherine | en |
local.open.fileurl | https://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/2dd7ba97-d808-422c-a2de-79519f60257c | en |
local.uneassociation | Unknown | en |
local.year.published | 2007 | en |
local.fileurl.open | https://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/2dd7ba97-d808-422c-a2de-79519f60257c | en |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
open/SOURCE02.pdf | Publisher version (open access) | 146.32 kB | Adobe PDF Download Adobe | View/Open |
Page view(s)
1,216
checked on Mar 10, 2024
Download(s)
612
checked on Mar 10, 2024
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.