Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/1746
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWerren, Julia Catherineen
dc.date.accessioned2009-05-25T12:11:00Z-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Law and Medicine, 15(2), p. 254-271en
dc.identifier.issn1320-159Xen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/1746-
dc.description.abstractThis article analyses how bioethics and law interact and work together. The first half of the article provides definitions of both ethics and bioethics. The article then considers a number of different bioethical standpoints to demonstrate the variance of views in relation to bioethics. In addition, the first half of the article focuses on the different regulatory possibilities in regard tobioethical contexts. This demonstrates that law is of central importance to bioethics. This part also shows that even though law and ethics are often used simultaneously to achieve bioethical goals, law and ethics cannot be used interchangeably. Thus, even though it is somewhat inevitable that law will be used in the pursuit of the goals of bioethics, bioethics and bioethical principle should not be merely a vehicle for law-makers to utilise. The second half of the article focuses on the issues of autonomy and consent to demonstrate how law and ethics have developed in one of the foundation areas of bioethics.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherThomson Lawbook Coen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Law and Medicineen
dc.titleThe bioethics and law paradox: An argument to maintain separateness with a hint of togethernessen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dcterms.accessRightsUNE Greenen
dc.subject.keywordsLawen
local.contributor.firstnameJulia Catherineen
local.subject.for2008180199 Law not elsewhere classifieden
local.subject.seo750599 Justice and the law not elsewhere classifieden
local.profile.schoolSchool of Lawen
local.profile.emailjwerren@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordpes:5244en
local.publisher.placeAustraliaen
local.format.startpage254en
local.format.endpage271en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume15en
local.identifier.issue2en
local.title.subtitleAn argument to maintain separateness with a hint of togethernessen
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameWerrenen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:jwerrenen
local.profile.orcid0000-0001-6750-5212en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1806en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleThe bioethics and law paradoxen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18035843en
local.relation.urlhttp://www.thomsonreuters.com.au/catalogue/shopexd.asp?id=965en
local.search.authorWerren, Julia Catherineen
local.open.fileurlhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/2dd7ba97-d808-422c-a2de-79519f60257cen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2007en
local.fileurl.openhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/2dd7ba97-d808-422c-a2de-79519f60257cen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Files in This Item:
5 files
File Description SizeFormat 
open/SOURCE02.pdfPublisher version (open access)146.32 kBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1,216
checked on Mar 10, 2024

Download(s)

612
checked on Mar 10, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.