Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/17328
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSalamonson, Yennaen
dc.contributor.authorEverett, Bronwynen
dc.contributor.authorHalcomb, Elizabethen
dc.contributor.authorHutchinson, Marieen
dc.contributor.authorJackson, Debraen
dc.contributor.authorMannix, Judyen
dc.contributor.authorPeters, Kathen
dc.contributor.authorWeaver, Roslynen
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-18T11:03:00Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationNurse Education Today, 35(1), p. 206-211en
dc.identifier.issn1532-2793en
dc.identifier.issn0260-6917en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/17328-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Clinical placement is an essential part of nursing education, and students' experiences on clinical placement can affect the quality of their learning. Understanding nursing students' positive and negative perceptions of clinical placement experience is therefore important. Objectives: To describe nursing students' satisfaction with their clinical placement experiences and identify any variations in satisfaction based on demographic characteristics. Design: Mixed methods - online survey with qualitative items. Setting: Four universities in Australia. Participants: Students (n=213) enrolled in an undergraduate nursing degree. Methods: Between 2010 and 2012, students completed online surveys following their clinical placement experiences. The surveys included demographic questions and the Clinical Learning Environment Inventory (CLEI-19), a 19-item tool measuring students' satisfaction with clinical placement. The surveys included two open-ended questions asking students to share their most satisfying and challenging experiences whilst on placement.Descriptive statistics and thematic analyses were undertaken. Results: Of the 213 participants, those in health-related employment and those with English as an additional language (EAL) were less satisfied with the clinical facility and with clinical facilitator support respectively, as indicated by the CLEI-19 subscale scores. Qualitative findings showed students were positive about the opportunity to make a difference and be involved in nursing, and negative about clinical facilitator support. Nevertheless, those who were most critical in their written comments about their placement were those who only spoke English at home. Conclusions: Although the study found overall satisfaction with clinical placement, the lower satisfaction reported by students in health-related employment, and the mixed findings regarding language spoken and satisfaction, warrant further attention.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden
dc.relation.ispartofNurse Education Todayen
dc.titleUnravelling the complexities of nursing students' feedback on the clinical learning environment: A mixed methods approachen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.nedt.2014.08.005en
dc.subject.keywordsNursingen
local.contributor.firstnameYennaen
local.contributor.firstnameBronwynen
local.contributor.firstnameElizabethen
local.contributor.firstnameMarieen
local.contributor.firstnameDebraen
local.contributor.firstnameJudyen
local.contributor.firstnameKathen
local.contributor.firstnameRoslynen
local.subject.for2008111099 Nursing not elsewhere classifieden
local.subject.seo2008929999 Health not elsewhere classifieden
local.profile.schoolSchool of Healthen
local.profile.emaildjackso4@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20150325-110332en
local.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen
local.format.startpage206en
local.format.endpage211en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume35en
local.identifier.issue1en
local.title.subtitleA mixed methods approachen
local.contributor.lastnameSalamonsonen
local.contributor.lastnameEveretten
local.contributor.lastnameHalcomben
local.contributor.lastnameHutchinsonen
local.contributor.lastnameJacksonen
local.contributor.lastnameMannixen
local.contributor.lastnamePetersen
local.contributor.lastnameWeaveren
dc.identifier.staffune-id:djackso4en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:17542en
local.identifier.handlehttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/17328en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleUnravelling the complexities of nursing students' feedback on the clinical learning environmenten
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorSalamonson, Yennaen
local.search.authorEverett, Bronwynen
local.search.authorHalcomb, Elizabethen
local.search.authorHutchinson, Marieen
local.search.authorJackson, Debraen
local.search.authorMannix, Judyen
local.search.authorPeters, Kathen
local.search.authorWeaver, Roslynen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2015en
local.subject.for2020420599 Nursing not elsewhere classifieden
local.subject.seo2020200201 Determinants of healthen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

25
checked on Mar 9, 2024

Page view(s)

996
checked on Mar 9, 2023

Download(s)

2
checked on Mar 9, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.